Many societies assign sharply distinguished roles to men and
women. Personality differences, as well as physical differences,
between men and women are used to justify these different sex
roles, and women are seen as more emotionally and interpersonally
sensitive than men, while men are said to be more competent,
achievement oriented, and assertive than women. A widely held view
is that not only do men and women differ but that possession of
"masculine" characteristics precludes possession of "feminine"
characteristics. This bipolar conception has led to the definition
of masculinity and femininity as opposites. Acceptance of this idea
has caused social scientists and laypersons to consider men and
women who possess cross-sex personality characteristics as less
emotionally healthy and socially adjusted than those with
sex-appropriate traits. Previous research by the authors and
others, done almost exclusively with college students, has shown,
however, that masculinity and femininity do not relate negatively
to each other, thus supporting a dualistic rather than a bipolar
conception of these two psychological dimensions.
Spence and Helmreich present data showing that the dualistic
conception holds for a large number of groups, varying widely in
age, geographical location, socioeconomic status, and patterns of
interest, whose psychological masculinity and femininity were
measured with an objective instrument, the Personality Attributes
Questionnaire, devised by the authors. Many individuals are shown
to be appropriately sex-typed; that is, men tend to be high in
masculinity and low in femininity and women the reverse. However, a
substantial number of men and women are androgynous--high in both
masculine and feminine characteristics--while some are not high in
either. Importantly, the authors find that androgynous individuals
display more self-esteem, social competence, and achievement
orientation than individuals who are strong in either masculinity
or femininity or are not strong in either.
One of the major contributions of the work is the development of
a new, multifaceted measure of achievement motivation (the Work and
Family Orientation Questionnaire), which can be used successfully
to predict behavior in both males and females and is related to
masculinity and femininity in both sexes.
In addition to investigating the correlates of masculinity and
femininity, the authors attempt to isolate parental factors that
contribute to the development of these characteristics and
achievement motivation. The book includes analyses of data from
students on their perception of their parents, which enable the
authors to examine the influence of parental masculinity and
femininity and parental behaviors and child-rearing attitudes on
the development of masculinity and femininity and achievement
motivation characteristics in their children. The important
implications of these findings for theories of sex roles,
personality development, and achievement motivation are
examined.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!