Is the United States Congress dead, alive, or trapped in a moribund
cycle? When confronted with controversial policy issues, members of
Congress struggle to satisfy conflicting legislative,
representative, and oversight duties. These competing goals, along
with the pressure to satisfy local constituents, cause members of
Congress to routinely cede power on a variety of policies, express
regret over their loss of control, and later return to the habit of
delegating their power. This pattern of institutional ambivalence
undermines conventional wisdom about congressional party
resurgence, the power of oversight, and the return of the so-called
imperial presidency. In Congressional Ambivalence, Jasmine Farrier
examines Congress's frequent delegation of power by analyzing
primary source materials such as bills, committee reports, and the
Congressional Record. Farrier demonstrates that Congress is caught
between abdication and ambition and that this ambivalence affects
numerous facets of the legislative process. Explaining specific
instances of post-delegation disorder, including Congress's use of
new bills, obstruction, public criticism, and oversight to salvage
its lost power, Farrier exposes the tensions surrounding Congress's
roles in recent hot-button issues such as base-closing commissions,
presidential trade promotion authority, and responses to the
attacks of September 11. She also examines shifting public rhetoric
used by members of Congress as they emphasize, in institutionally
self-conscious terms, the difficulties of balancing their multiple
roles. With a deep understanding of the inner workings of the
federal government, Farrier illuminates a developing trend in the
practice of democracy.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!