In an era of polarization, narrow party majorities, and
increasing use of supermajority requirements in the Senate, policy
entrepreneurs must find ways to reach across the aisle and build
bipartisan coalitions in Congress. One such coalition-building
strategy is the "politics of efficiency," or reform that is aimed
at eliminating waste from existing policies and programs. After
all, reducing inefficiency promises to reduce costs without cutting
benefits, which should appeal to members of both political parties,
especially given tight budgetary constraints in Washington.
"Dust-Up" explores the most recent congressional efforts to
reform asbestos litigation -- a case in which the politics of
efficiency played a central role and seemed likely to prevail. Yet,
these efforts failed to produce a winning coalition, even though
reform could have saved billions of dollars and provided quicker
compensation to victims of asbestos-related diseases. Why? The
answers, as Jeb Barnes deftly illustrates, defy conventional wisdom
and force us to rethink the political effects of litigation and the
dynamics of institutional change in our fragmented policymaking
system.
Set squarely at the intersection of law, politics, and public
policy, "Dust-Up" provides the first in-depth analysis of the
political obstacles to Congress in replacing a form of litigation
that nearly everyone -- Supreme Court justices, members of
Congress, presidents, and experts -- agrees is woefully inefficient
and unfair to both victims and businesses. This concise and
accessible case study includes a glossary of terms and study
questions, making it a perfect fit for courses in law and public
policy, congressional politics, and public health.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!