How do threats of terrorism affect the opinions of citizens?
Speculation abounds, but until now no one had marshaled hard
evidence to explain the complexities of this relationship. Drawing
on data from surveys and original experiments they conducted in the
United States and Mexico, Jennifer Merolla and Elizabeth
Zechmeister demonstrate how our strategies for coping with
terrorist threats significantly influence our attitudes toward
fellow citizens, political leaders, and foreign nations.
The authors reveal, for example, that some people try to restore a
sense of order and control through increased wariness of
others--especially of those who exist outside the societal
mainstream. Additionally, voters under threat tend to prize "strong
leadership" more highly than partisan affiliation, making some
politicians seem more charismatic than they otherwise would. The
authors show that a wary public will sometimes continue to empower
such leaders after they have been elected, giving them greater
authority even at the expense of institutional checks and balances.
Having demonstrated that a climate of terrorist threat also
increases support for restrictive laws at home and engagement
against terrorists abroad, Merolla and Zechmeister conclude that
our responses to such threats can put democracy at risk.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!