"Questions of Form "was first published in 1989. Minnesota
Archive Editions uses digital technology to make long-unavailable
books once again accessible, and are published unaltered from the
original University of Minnesota Press editions.
In "Questions on Form," Joelle Proust traces the concept of the
analytic proposition from Kant's development of the notion down to
its place in the work of Rudolf Carnap, a founder of logical
empiricism and a key figure in contemporary analytic philosophy.
Using a method known in France as "topique comparative," she
provides a rigorous exposition of analyticity, situating it within
four major philosophical systems--those of Kant, Bolzano, Frege,
and Carnap--and clearly delineating its development from one system
to the next.
Proust takes as her point of departure Kant's distinction
between analytic and synthetic judgments. Though she makes clear
that Kant drew on Locke, Hume, and Leibniz, she argues that his
notion of analyticity was innovative, not simply an elaboration of
something already found in their work. She shows that the analytic
proposition unexpectedly (given its modest status in Kant) came to
play an important part in efforts to convert problems considered
"transcendental" into questions of belonging to formal logic.
Ultimately, her comparison of their systems reveals that the
concept of the analytic, however specific its rile in each, remains
linked to a foundationalist strategy--in effect, to the
transcendentalist questions Kant used when he reinterpreted the
findings of his empiricist predecessors. Hence, this book's
provocative claim: today's so-called logical empiricism owes much
more to Kant's notion of science than to Hume's.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!