Books > History > History of specific subjects > Military history
|
Buy Now
Fire for Effect - Field Artillery and Close Air Support in the US Army (Paperback)
Loot Price: R603
Discovery Miles 6 030
|
|
Fire for Effect - Field Artillery and Close Air Support in the US Army (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
The genesis of this work, "Fire for Effect: Field Artillery and
Close Air Support in the US Army," was the controversial decision
in 2001 to deploy Army combat units to Afghanistan without their
supporting field artillery units. Fire for Effect provides a
historical survey of the relationship between field artillery and
close air support (CAS) in the US Army since World War I. A
recurring theme in this survey is the desire of air operators for
independence in operations. This first occurs at the organizational
level in the development of strategic bombing theories and forces.
The desire for independence emerges also in Air Force doctrine
which stressed the importance of interdiction over CAS missions.
Eventually, the Army aviation community also sought independence in
the idea of the independent strike of attack helicopters, known as
the deep attack. This last concept became at least partially
discredited in the sands of Iraq in 2003. Independent air
operations contrast with the Army's traditional combined arms
concept where the arms and services work together to complement
each other's strengths and cover weaknesses. The field artillery
has long been a key member of the combined arms team. The Army
ground commander has controlled all the elements of this team
except the fixed-wing close air support. Despite the differences in
theory and practice, since the 1960s the two services have
developed cooperative and coordinated systems that have solved most
difficulties. Over these last 40 years, much progress has also been
made with the development of precision guided munitions, giving
both services the ability to use point fire weapons in their
delivery of CAS. As this study shows, the introduction of
sophisticated precision weapons has separated CAS from artillery,
creating distinct and complementary systems of fire support. Both,
however, remain necessary to give the ground commander responsive
and powerful fires in the broad variety of combat situations that
characterize the modern battlefield.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.