Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence > War & defence operations
|
Buy Now
Losing Binh Dinh - The Failure of Pacification and Vietnamization, 1969-1971 (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R1,339
Discovery Miles 13 390
|
|
Losing Binh Dinh - The Failure of Pacification and Vietnamization, 1969-1971 (Hardcover)
Series: Modern War Studies
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Americans have fought two prolonged battles over Vietnam-one in
southeast Asia and one, ongoing even now, at home-over whether the
war was unnecessary, unjust, and unwinnable. Revisionist historians
who reject this view have formulated many contra-factual scenarios
for how the war might have been won, but also put forward one
historically testable hypothesis-namely that the war actually was
won after the 1968 Tet Offensive, only to be thrown away later
through a failure of political will. It is this ""Lost Victory""
hypothesis that Kevin M. Boylan takes up in Losing Binh Dinh,
aiming to determine once and for all whether the historical record
supports such a claim. Proponents of the ""Lost Victory"" thesis
contend that by 1972, President Richard Nixon's policy of
""Vietnamization"" had effectively eliminated South Vietnamese
insurgents, ""pacified"" the countryside, and prepared the South
Vietnamese to defend their own territory with only logistical and
financial support from Americans. Rejecting the top-down approach
favored by Revisionists, Boylan examines the facts on the ground in
Binh Dinh, a strategically vital province that was the second most
populous in South Vietnam, controlled key transportation routes,
and contained one of the nation's few major seaports as well as the
huge US Air Force base at Phu Cat. Taking an in-depth look at
operations that were conducted in the province, Boylan is able to
uncover the fundamental flaw in the dual objectives of
""Vietnamization"" and ""Pacification""-namely, that they were
mutually exclusive. The inefficiency and corruption of the South
Vietnamese government and armed forces was so crippling that
progress in pacification occurred only when Americans took the
lead-which, in turn, left the South Vietnamese even more dependent
on US support.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.