Books > Science & Mathematics > Mathematics > Probability & statistics
|
Buy Now
Statistical Theory - The Relationship of Probability, Credibility, and Error (Paperback)
Loot Price: R705
Discovery Miles 7 050
You Save: R84
(11%)
|
|
Statistical Theory - The Relationship of Probability, Credibility, and Error (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
STATISTICAL THEORY The Relationship of Probability Credibility and.
Error LANCELOT HOGBEN, F. R. S Statistical Theory The Relationship
of PROBABILITY, CREDIBILITY AND ERROR AN EXAMINATION OF THE
CONTEMPORARY CRISIS IN STATISTICAL THEORY FROM A BEHAVIOURIST
VIEWPOINT V-W-NORTON COMPANY INC Publishers New York CONTENTS
Foreword page 7 1 The Contemporary Crisis or the Uncertainties of
Uncertain Inference 13 PART I. THE FOUNDING FATHERS 2 The Founding
Fathers and the Natural History of Gambling 33 3 Randomness and the
Relevance of the Rule 59 4 Division of the Stakes and the Lottery
of Life and Death 83 5 The Backward Look and the Balance Sheet of
Thomas Bayes no 6 The Place of Laplace and the Grand Climacteric of
the Classical Tradition 133 PART II. THE CALCULUS OF ERROR AND THE
CALCULUS OF EXPLORATION 7 The Normal Law comes into the Picture 159
8 The Method of Least Squares and the Concept of Point Estimation
182 9 Error, Variation and Natural Law 210 10 Stochastic Models for
Simple Regression 232 11 The Impasse of Factor Analysis 257 PART
III. THE CALCULUS OF AGGREGATES 12 Maxwell and the Urn of Mature
279 13 Mendelism and the Two Meanings of Probability 297 PART IV.
THE CALCULUS OF JUDGMENTS 14 Statistical Prudence and Statistical
Inference 319 1 5 Decision Indecision and Sample Economy 345 1 6
Induction and Design, Stochastic and Non-stochastic 370 1 7 Recipe
and Rule in Stochastic Induction 399 1 8 The Confidence Controversy
and the Fifth Canon 433 1 9 Epilogue 454 Appendix I 477 Appendix II
480 Appendix III 485 Appendix IV 7 Index 07 FOREWORD THE USE of the
word behaviourist in my sub-title calls for clari fication. It came
into current usage chiefly through the writings of J. B.Watson, in
the first fine flush of enthusiasm following the reception of
Pavlovs work on conditioned reflexes. Watson conveyed the
impression that all forms of animal including human behaviour are
ultimately explicable in terms of neural or humoral co-ordination
of receptors and effectors. Neither this proposition nor its denial
is susceptible of proof. A comet may destroy the earth before we
have completed a research programme of such magnitude as the
operative adverb ultimately suggests. Many years ago, and in what
now seems to me a very im mature volume of essays written as a
counter-irritant to the mystique of Eddingtons Nature of the
Physical World, I suggested a more restricted definition of the
term and offered an alter native which seemingly did not commend
itself to my con temporaries. By behaviourist in this context I
mean what Ryle means in the concluding section of his recent book
The Concept of Mind. What Ryle speaks of as the behaviourist
viewpoint and what I had previously preferred to call the publicist
outlook has no concern with structure and mechanism. Our common
approach to the problem of cognition is not at the ontological
level. The class of questions we regard as profitable topics of
enquiry in this context arise at the level of epistemology, or,
better still, what G. P. Meredith calls epistemics. If one wishes
to discuss with any hope of reaching agreement what one means by
knowledge or preferably knowing the two main topics of the agenda
for our public symposium will be recognition and communication and
we shall discuss them as different facets of the same problem,
neither meaningful in isolation. A simple illustration will suffice
to make clear, both at theemotive level of non-communicable private
conviction and at the public or communicable level of observable be
haviour, the difference between knowing, conceived as a process,
and knowledge, conceived as a static repository. The Nature of
Living Matter 1930. 7 STATISTICAL THEORY We shall suppose that B is
colour-blind to differences in the red and green regions of the
visible spectrum, A being normal in the customary sense of the term
in the relevant context...
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.