0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > History > American history

Buy Now

Reconsidering Judicial Finality - Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (Hardcover) Loot Price: R1,509
Discovery Miles 15 090
Reconsidering Judicial Finality - Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (Hardcover): Louis Fisher

Reconsidering Judicial Finality - Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (Hardcover)

Louis Fisher

 (sign in to rate)
Loot Price R1,509 Discovery Miles 15 090 | Repayment Terms: R141 pm x 12*

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days

Federal judges, legal scholars, pundits, and reporters frequently describe the Supreme Court as the final word on the meaning of the Constitution. The historical record presents an entirely different picture. A close and revealing reading of that record, from 1789 to the present day, Reconsidering Judicial Finality reminds us of the "unalterable fact," as Chief Justice Rehnquist once remarked, "that our judicial system, like the human beings who administer it, is fallible." And a Court inevitably prone to miscalculation and error, as this book clearly demonstrates, cannot have the incontrovertible last word on constitutional questions. In this deeply researched, sharply reasoned work of legal myth-busting, constitutional scholar Louis Fisher explains how constitutional disputes are Settled by all three branches of government, and by the general public, with the Supreme Court often playing a secondary role. The Court's decisions have, of course, been challenged and reversed in numerous cases-involving slavery, civil rights, child labor legislation, Japanese internment during World War II, abortion, and religious liberty. What Fisher shows us on a case-by-case basis is how the elected branches, scholars, and American public regularly press policies contrary to Court rulings-and regularly prevail, although the process might sometimes take decades. From the common misreading of Marbury v. Madison, to the mistaken understanding of the Supreme Court as the trusted guardian of individual rights, to the questionable assumptions of the Court's decision in Citizens United, Fisher's work charts the distance and the difference between the Court as the ultimate arbiter in constitutional matters and the judgment of history. The verdict of Reconsidering Judicial Finality is clear: to treat the Supreme Court's nine justices as democracy's last hope or as dangerous activists undermining democracy is to vest them with undue significance. The Constitution belongs to all three branches of government-and, finally, to the American people.

General

Imprint: University Press of Kansas
Country of origin: United States
Release date: August 2019
Authors: Louis Fisher
Dimensions: 229 x 152 x 28mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover - Cloth over boards
Pages: 288
ISBN-13: 978-0-7006-2810-0
Categories: Books > Humanities > History > American history > General
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Constitution, government & the state
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Courts & procedure > General
Books > History > American history > General
LSN: 0-7006-2810-X
Barcode: 9780700628100

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners