Books > Law > International law > Public international law > International human rights law
|
Buy Now
When Humans Become Migrants - Study of the European Court of Human Rights with an Inter-American Counterpoint (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R3,742
Discovery Miles 37 420
|
|
When Humans Become Migrants - Study of the European Court of Human Rights with an Inter-American Counterpoint (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Tthe treatment of migrants is one of the most challenging issues
that human rights, as a political philosophy, faces today. It has
increasingly become a contentious issue for many governments and
international organizations around the world. The controversies
surrounding immigration can lead to practices at odds with the
ethical message embodied in the concept of human rights, and the
notion of 'migrants' as a group which should be treated in a
distinct manner. This book examines the way in which two
institutions tasked with ensuring the protection of human rights,
the European Court of Human Rights and Inter-American Court of
Human Rights, treat claims lodged by migrants. It combines legal,
sociological, and historical analysis to show that the two courts
were the product of different backgrounds, which led to differing
attitudes towards migrants in their founding texts, and that these
differences were reinforced in their developing case law. The book
assesses the case law of both courts in detail to argue that they
approach migrant cases from fundamentally different perspectives.
It asserts that the European Court of Human Rights treats migrants
first as aliens, and then, but only as a second step in its
reasoning, as human beings. By contrast, the Inter-American Court
of Human Rights approaches migrants first as human beings, and
secondly as foreigners (if they are). Dembour argues therefore that
the Inter-American Court of Human Rights takes a fundamentally more
human rights-driven approach to this issue. The book shows how
these trends formed at the courts, and assesses whether their
approaches have changed over time. It also assesses in detail the
issue of the detention of irregular migrants. Ultimately it
analyses whether the divergence in the case law of the two courts
is likely to continue, or whether they could potentially adopt a
more unified practice.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.