Machiavelli has been viewed as the forerunner of the humanists
of our day, liberals and socialists, who have discovered that moral
ends sometimes require immoral means. Against this interpretation,
Mark Hulliung argues that Machiavelli's "humanism," was rooted in
classical notions of grandeur and greatness, and that his prime
reason for admiring the ancient Roman republic was that it
conquered the world. In short, Machiavelli was at his most
Machiavellian precisely when he voiced his "civic humanism."
Hulliung argues that Machiavelli's embrace of fraud and violence
cannot be justified by patriotism or a professed concern with the
common good. He indicts Machiavelli's use and abuse of history in
the service of his cynical agenda--the quest for power. Hulliung
sees Machiavelli as a republican imperialist, embracing the heroic
pagan virtues and consciously subverting the humanistic tradition
of Cicero, and the religious morality of Christianity, with an
intentionally skewed interpretation of republican Rome.
By inverting the Stoical and Christian elements of the classics,
Machiavelli made the humanistic tradition give birth to
Machiavellism, its terrible child. Hulliung's thesis is convincing,
and his book is a valuable contribution to the debate on
Machiavellian thought.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!