Traditionally, the secession of the states in the lower South
has been viewed as an irrational response to Lincoln's election or
as a rational response to the genuine threat a Republican president
posed to the geographical expansion of slavery. Both views
emphasize the fundamental importance of relations between the
federal government and the southern states, but overlook the degree
to which secession was a response to a crisis within the South.
Johnson argues that secession was a double revolution -- for
home rule and for those who ruled at home -- brought about by an
internal crisis in southern society. He portrays secession as the
culmination of the long-developing tension between slavery on one
side and the institutional and ideological consequences of the
American Revolution on the other. This tension was masked during
the antebellum years by the conflicting social, political,
sectional, and national loyalties of many southerners. Lincoln's
election forced southerners to choose among their loyalties, and
their choice revealed a South that was divided along lines
coinciding roughly with an interest in slavery and the established
order.
Starting with a thorough analysis of election data and
integrating quantitative with more traditional literary sources,
Johnson goes beyond the act of secession itself to examine what the
secessionists said and did after they left the Union. Although this
book is a close study of secession in Georgia, it has implications
for the rest of the lower South. The result is a new thesis that
presents secession as the response to a more complex set of
motivations than has been recognized.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!