The historical record concerning industrialization since 1770 is
consistent with the classical view of economic growth, but not with
the currently accepted neo-classical growth theory. Flaws in the
logic and empirical short-comings of the neo-classical theory
suggest that it should be rejected. Specifically, ideas that
originate in static concepts cannot be applied to growth, a dynamic
process. Nineteenth-century industrialization, the world wars and
the Depression, the post-war boom, and the more recent slowdown in
growth are discussed.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!