Books > Professional & Technical > Civil engineering, surveying & building > Building construction & materials > Fire protection & safety
|
Buy Now
Smoke Alarm Performance in Kitchen Fires and Nuisance Alarm Scenarios (Paperback)
Loot Price: R361
Discovery Miles 3 610
|
|
Smoke Alarm Performance in Kitchen Fires and Nuisance Alarm Scenarios (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R361
Discovery Miles 3 610
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Tests were conducted to assess the performance of various
residential smoke alarms to kitchen fires and nuisance alarm
cooking scenarios. A test structure representing a kitchen, living
room and hallway was constructed to conduct the tests. Eight
different residential smoke alarms types, two photoelectric models,
two ionization models, two dual sensor models, and two
multi-sensor, intelligent models were used in this study. The data
gathered provided insight into the susceptibility of alarm
activation from exposures to typical cooking events and alarm times
for actual kitchen fires. The effects on the type of alarm, and its
distance from the cooking activity or fire were examined.
Combustible materials typically found on a counter top can spread
flames to overhead cabinets, and a single empty 0.6 m wide 1.0 m
tall cabinet can produce a peak heat release rate nearly sufficient
to flashover a small room. A protective metal barrier on the bottom
and side facing the range tended to limit the spread of flames to
the cabinet and reduce the heat release rate. All smoke alarms
responded before hazardous conditions developed. The I1 alarm
tended to respond first at a given location. Results show smoke
alarms placed at the furthest location may provide less than 120 s
of available safe egress time, which suggests a more central alarm
location closer to the kitchen for this configuration. Ten cooking
activities were examined to determine an alarm s propensity to
activate to cooking aerosols. In most cases, the propensity to
nuisance alarm decreased as the distance from the cooking source
increased. Alarms that rely on sensitive ionization chambers (here
I1 and D2) experience more nuisance alarm activations across all
cooking activities and locations. All alarms except I1 and D2
experienced about the same nuisance alarm frequency across all
cooking activities for locations outside the kitchen.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.