Why did the Soviet system fail? How is it that a political
order, born of revolution, perished from stagnation? What caused a
seemingly stable polity to collapse? Philip Roeder finds the answer
to these questions in the Bolshevik "constitution"--the fundamental
rules of the Soviet system that evolved from revolutionary times
into the post-Stalin era. These rules increasingly prevented the
Communist party from responding to the immense social changes that
it had itself set in motion: although the Soviet political system
initially had vast resources for transforming society, its ability
to transform itself became severely limited.
In Roeder's view, the problem was not that Soviet leaders did
not attempt to change, but that their attempts were so often
defeated by institutional resistance to reform. The leaders'
successful efforts to stabilize the political system reduced its
adaptability, and as the need for reform continued to mount,
stability became a fatal flaw. Roeder's analysis of institutional
constraints on political behavior represents a striking departure
from the biographical approach common to other analyses of Soviet
leadership, and provides a strong basis for comparison of the
Soviet experience with constitutional transformation in other
authoritarian polities.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!