Unemployment - Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market (Hardcover, Revised)

This broad survey of unemployment will be a major source of reference for both scholars and students. It aims to provide a basis for better policy: showing how the lessons learned from experience and theory can be applied to greatly reduce the waste and misery of high unemployment. The book surveys in a clear, concise manner the main aspects of the unemployment problem. It integrates macroeconomics with a detailed micro-analysis of the labour market. It uses the authors' model to explain the puzzling post-war history of OECD unemployment and shows how unemployment and inflation are affected by systems of wage bargaining and unemployment insurance. For each issue the authors' develop a relevant theory, followed by extensive empirical analysis. The authors are established experts in the field, and this book gives their definitive treatment. Now revised to include an analysis of unemployment changes since 1991, it is clear the authors' original model has stood the test of time making this book a must read for any student studying economics at an advanced level.

General

Imprint:	Oxford UniversityPress
Country of origin:	United Kingdom
Release date:	2005
First published:	March 2005
Authors:	Richard Layard (Head of the Centre for Labour Economics) • Stephen Nickell (Professor of Economics) • Richard Jackman (Lecturer)
Dimensions:	241 x 166 x 42mm (L x W x T)
Format:	Hardcover
Pages:	672
Edition:	Revised
ISBN-13:	978-0-19-927916-6
Categories:	Books > Business & Economics > Economics > Macroeconomics > General Books > Business & Economics > Economics > Labour economics > Employment & unemployment Promotions
LSN:	0-19-927916-0
Barcode:	9780199279166

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!