"Quite the contrary of old generals, nations do not fade away;
they have to be killed."
Richard Adams' view of the nation as a basic social unit is
central to this pioneering study in social anthropology. The result
of many years of research in Guatemala, this volume utilizes the
author's fieldwork as well as that of his colleagues and students
to construct a set of concepts explaining how Guatemala reached the
difficult circumstances in which it found itself in the 1960s--and
still finds itself today.
With the breakup of the great colonial empires after the Second
World War, the curtain that had been drawn around Marx by Western
social scientists fell away; countries once called "primitive"
began to be seen as "underdeveloped," while those once thought to
be stable and advanced began to appear predatory and conflict
ridden. The theme of Mr. Adams' book is that, in the world as a
whole, there is a structural escalation of power concentration.
The author believes that Guatemala, as a small nation within the
general domain of the United States, is caught in the developmental
hinterland of that powerful neighbor and that the United States,
within its own capitalistic development pattern and in competition
with other leading world powers, cannot allow the smaller nation to
resolve its own political and social problems. Thus Guatemala, he
declares, finds itself crucified by unyielding and uncontrollable
power plays beyond its national borders.
As a background for the study of specific sectors in Guatemalan
society, the author discusses the theoretical nature of complex
societies. He shows the cohesive force of a nation to be its power
structure and then examines mechanisms whereby this structure is
kept intact in Guatemala. Special emphasis is given to the lack of
access to power by the poor, the development of the military, the
organization of power within the Catholic Church, and the expansion
of upper-sector interest groups.
While there was important growth in the power of upper-sector
Guatemalan society over the two decades of the study, there was no
comparable increase in distribution; the position of the lower
sectors within the power structure has therefore changed very
slightly. "Development," then, in Guatemala was principally in
terms of what was advantageous to the major powers.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!