Students of comparative politics have long faced a vexing
dilemma: how can social scientists draw broad, applicable
principles of political order from specific historical examples? In
Analytic Narratives, five senior scholars offer a new and ambitious
methodological response to this important question. By employing
rational-choice and game theory, the authors propose a way of
extracting empirically testable, general hypotheses from particular
cases. The result is both a methodological manifesto and an applied
handbook that political scientists, economic historians,
sociologists, and students of political economy will find
essential.
In their jointly written introduction, the authors frame their
approach to the origins and evolution of political institutions.
The individual essays that follow demonstrate the concept of the
analytic narrative--a rational-choice approach to explain political
outcomes--in case studies. Avner Greif traces the institutional
foundations of commercial expansion in twelfth-century Genoa.
Jean-Laurent Rosenthal analyzes how divergent fiscal policies
affected absolutist European governments, while Margaret Levi
examines the transformation of nineteenth-century conscription laws
in France, the United States, and Prussia. Robert Bates explores
the emergence of a regulatory organization in the international
coffee market. Finally, Barry Weingast studies the institutional
foundations of democracy in the antebellum United States and its
breakdown in the Civil War. In the process, these studies highlight
the economic role of political organizations, the rise and
deterioration of political communities, and the role of coercion,
especially warfare, in political life. The results are both
empirically relevant and theoretically sophisticated.
"Analytic Narratives "is an innovative and provocative work that
bridges the gap between the game-theoretic and empirically driven
approaches in political economy. Political historians will find the
use of rational-choice models novel; theorists will discover
arguments more robust and nuanced than those derived from abstract
models. The book improves on earlier studies by advocating--and
applying--a cross-disciplinary approach to explain strategic
decision making in history.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!