In this book, Robert Talisse critically examines the moral and
political implications of pluralism, the view that our best moral
thinking is indeterminate and that moral conflict is an inescapable
feature of the human condition. Through a careful engagement with
the work of William James, Isaiah Berlin, John Rawls, and their
contemporary followers, Talisse distinguishes two broad types of
moral pluralism: metaphysical and epistemic. After arguing that
metaphysical pluralism does not offer a compelling account of value
and thus cannot ground a viable conception of liberal politics,
Talisse proposes and defends a distinctive variety of epistemic
pluralism. According to this view, certain value conflicts are at
present undecidable rather than intrinsic. Consequently, epistemic
pluralism countenances the possibility that further argumentation,
enhanced reflection, or the acquisition of more information could
yield rational resolutions to the kinds of value conflicts that
metaphysical pluralists deem irresolvable as such. Talisse 's
epistemic pluralism hence prescribes a politics in which deep value
conflicts are to be addressed by ongoing argumentation and free
engagement among citizens; the epistemic pluralist thus sees
liberal democracy is the proper political response to ongoing moral
disagreement. While developing his view, Talisse engages central
issues in contemporary liberal political theory, including
toleration, state neutrality, public justification, and the
accommodation of illiberal sub-cultures. This book will be of
interest to ethicists, political philosophers, and political
scientists.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!