Ever since Harts The Concept of Law, legal philosophers agree
that the practice of law-applying officials is a fundamental aspect
of law. Yet there is a huge disagreement on the nature of this
practice. Is it a conventional practice? Is it like the practice
that takes place, more generally, when there is a social rule in a
group? Does it share the nature of collective intentional action?
The book explores the main responses to these questions, and claims
that they fail on two main counts: current theories do not explain
officials beliefs that they are under a duty qua members of an
institution, and they do not explain officials disagreement about
the content of these institutional duties. Based on a particular
theory of collective action, the author elaborates then an account
of certain institutions, and claims that the practice is an
institutional practice of sorts. This would explain officials
beliefs in institutional duties, and officials disagreement about
those duties.
The book should be of interest to legal philosophers, but also
to those concerned with group and social action theories and, more
generally, with the nature of institutions."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!