As budgetary concerns have come to dominate Congressional
action, the design and implementation of welfare programs have come
under greater scrutiny. This book focuses on the food stamp program
to examine how the growing integration of welfare and budgeting has
affected both politics and people.
Applying insightful analysis to this important policy topic,
Ronald F. King looks at the effects on welfare transfers of the
kinds of budgetary rules adopted by Congress: discretion,
entitlement, and expenditure caps. King uses models based on these
forms to interpret the events in the history of the food stamp
program up to the welfare reform of 1996, and he shows how these
different budget rules have affected political strategies among key
actors and policy outcomes.
King analyzes tensions in the program between budgetary concerns
and entitlement, revealing that budget mechanisms which seek to cap
the growth of entitlement spending have perverse but predictable
effects. He also explores the broader conflict between procedural
and substantive justice, which pits inclusive democratic
decision-making against special protections for the needy and
vulnerable in society.
The food stamp program offers a valuable opportunity for
studying the influence of shifting institutional factors. In an era
when budgetary anxieties coexist with continuing poverty, King's
book sheds new light on the increasing fiscalization of welfare in
America.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!