This volume tackles head-on the controversy regarding the
tensions between the principles underlying Academe on the one hand,
and the free market on the other. Its outspoken thesis posits that
seemingly irresistible institutional pressures are betraying a core
principle of the Enlightenment: that the free pursuit of knowledge
is of the highest value in its own right. As 'market principles'
are forced on universities, inducing a neoteric culture of
'managerialism', many worry that the very characteristics that made
European higher education in particular such a success are being
eroded and replaced by ideological opportunism and economic
expediency.
Richly interdisciplinary, the anthology explores a wealth of issues
such as the phenomenon of bibliometrics (linking an institution's
success to the volume and visibility of publications produced).
Many argue that the use of such indicators to measure scientific
value is inimical to the time-consuming complexities of genuine
truth-seeking. A number of the greatest discoveries and innovations
in the history of science, such as Newton's laws of mechanics or
the Mendelian laws of inheritance, might never have seen the light
of day if today's system of determining and defining the form and
content of science had dominated. With analytical perspectives from
political science, economics, philosophy and media studies, the
collection interrogates, for example, the doctrine of graduate
employability that exerts such a powerful influence on course type
and structure, especially on technical and professional training.
In contrast, the liberal arts must choose between adaptation to the
dictates of employability strategies or wither away as enrollments
dwindle and resources evaporate. Research projects and aims have
also become an area of controversy, with many governments now
assessing the value of proposals in terms of assumed commercial
benefits. The contributors argue that these changes, as well as
'reforms' in the managerial and administrative structures in
tertiary education, constitute a radical break with the previous
ontology of science and scholarship: a change in its very
character, and not merely its form. It shows that the 'scientific
thinking' students, researchers, and scholars are encouraged to
adopt is undergoing a rapid shift in conceptual content, with
significant consequences not only for science, but also for the
society of which it is a part."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!