What does it mean to have a constitution? Scholars and students
associated with Walter Murphy at Princeton University have long
asked this question in their exploration of constitutional politics
and judicial behavior. These scholars, concerned with the making,
maintenance, and deliberate change of the Constitution, have made
unique and significant contributions to our understanding of
American constitutional law by going against the norm of
court-centered and litigation-minded research. Beginning in the
late 1970s, this new wave of academics explored questions ranging
from the nature of creating the U.S. Constitution to the philosophy
behind amending it.
In this collection, Sotirios A. Barber and Robert P. George
bring together fourteen essays by members of this Princeton
group--some of the most distinguished scholars in the field. These
works consider the meaning of having a constitution, the
implications of particular choices in the design of constitutions,
and the meaning of judicial supremacy in the interpretation of the
Constitution. The overarching ambition of this collection is to
awaken a constitutionalist consciousness in its readers--to view
themselves as potential makers and changers of constitutions, as
opposed to mere subjects of existing arrangements.
In addition to the editors, the contributors are Walter F.
Murphy, John E. Finn, Christopher L. Eisgruber, James E. Fleming,
Jeffrey K. Tulis, Suzette Hemberger, Stephen Macedo, Sanford
Levinson, H. N. Hirsch, Wayne D. Moore, Keith E. Whittington, and
Mark E. Brandon.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!