Debate on public issues--and where candidates stand on them--
have traditionally represented the focal point of presidential
campaigns. In recent decades, however, rather than asking where
candidates stand on the issues, the public increasingly wants to
know who they are. The issue of character has thus come to dominate
presidential elections.
While there is increasing public awareness that the psychology,
judgment, and leadership qualities of presidential candidates
count, the basis on which these judgments should made remains
unclear. Does it matter that Gary Hart changed his name or had an
affair? Should Ed Muskie's loss of composure while defending his
wife during a campaign speech, or Thomas Eagleton's hospitalization
for depression, have counted against them?
Looking back over the past 25 years, Stanley Renshon, a
political scientist and psychoanalyst, provides the first
comprehensive accounting of how character has become an
increasingly important issue in a presidential campaign. He traces
two related but distinctive approaches to the issue of presidential
character and psychology. The first concerns the mental health of
our candidates and presidents. Are they emotionally and personally
stable? Is their temperament suitable for the presidency? The
second concerns character. Is the candidate honest? Does he possess
the necessary judgment and motivation to deal with the tremendous
responsibilities and pressures of the office?
Drawing on his clinical and political science training, Renshon
has devised a theory which will allow the public to better evaluate
presidential candidates. Why are honesty, integrity, and personal
ideals so important in judging candidates? Is personal and
political ambition necessarily a bad trait? Do extra-marital
affairs really matter? Finally, and most importantly, how can the
public tell whether a candidate's leadership will be enhanced or
impeded by aspects of his personality?
With this sweeping volume, Stanley Renshon has provided us with
the most comprehensive account to date of how the public judges,
and should judge, our future presidents.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!