Many now see future warfare as a matter of nonstate actors
employing irregular methods against Western states. This
expectation has given rise to a range of sweeping proposals for
transforming the U.S. military to meet such threats. In this
context, Hezbollah's 2006 campaign in southern Lebanon has been
receiving increasing attention as a prominent recent example of a
nonstate actor fighting a Westernized state. In particular, critics
of irregular-warfare transformation often cite the 2006 case as
evidence that non-state actors can nevertheless wage conventional
warfare in state-like ways. This monograph assesses this claim via
a detailed analysis of Hezbollah's military behavior, coupled with
deductive inference from observable Hezbollah behavior in the field
to findings for their larger strategic intent for the campaign.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!