In the last decade, the production of mechanical components to be
assembled in final products produced in high volumes (e.g. cars,
mopeds, industrial vehicles, etc.) has undergone deep changes due
to the overall modifications in the way companies compete.
Companies must consider competitive factors such as short lead
times, tight product tolerances, frequent market changes and cost
reduction. Anyway, companies often have to define production
objectives as trade-offs among these critical factors since it can
be difficult to improve all of them.
Even if system flexibility is often considered a fundamental
requirement for firms, it is not always a desirable characteristic
of a system because it requires relevant investment cost which can
jeopardize the profitability of the firm. Dedicated systems are not
able to adapt to changes of the product characteristics while
flexible systems offer more flexibility than what is needed, thus
increasing investment and operative costs. Production contexts
characterized by mid to high demand volume of well identified
families of products in continuous evolution do not require the
highest level of flexibility; therefore, manufacturing system
flexibility must be rationalized and it is necessary to find out
the best trade-off between productivity and flexibility by
designing manufacturing systems endowed with the right level of
flexibility required by the production problem. This new class of
production systems can be named Focused Flexibility Manufacturing
Systems-FFMSs.
The flexibility degree in FFMSs is related to their ability to
cope with volume, mix and technological changes, and it must take
into account both present and future changes. Therequired level of
system flexibility impacts on the architecture of the system and
the explicit design of flexibility often leads to hybrid systems,
i.e. automated integrated systems in which parts can be processed
by both general purpose and dedicated machines. This is a key issue
of FFMSs and results from the matching of flexibility and
productivity that respectively characterize FMSs and Dedicated
Manufacturing Systems (DMSs).
The market share of the EU in the machine tool sector is 44%;
the introduction of focused flexibility would be particularly
important for machine tool builders whose competitive advantage is
based on the ability of customizing their systems on the basis of
needs of their customers. In fact, even if current production
contexts frequently present situations which would fit well with
the FFMS approach, tradition and know-how of machine tool builders
play a crucial role. Firms often agree with the focused flexibility
vision, nevertheless they decide not to pay the risk and efforts
related to the design of this new system architecture. This is due
also to the lack of well-structured design approaches which can
help machine tool builders to configure innovative systems.
Therefore, the FFMS topic is studied through the book chapters
following a shared mission: "To define methodologies and tools to
design production systems with a minimum level of flexibility
needed to face, during their lifecycle, the product and process
evolution both in the technological and demand aspects. The goal is
to find out the optimal trade-off between flexibility and
productivity."
The book framework follows the architecture which has been
developed to address the FFMS Design problem.This architecture is
both broad and detailed, since it pays attention to all the
relevant levels in a firm hierarchy which are involved in the
system design. Moreover, the architecture is innovative because it
models both the point of view of the machine tool builder and the
point of view of the system user.
The architecture starts analyzing Manufacturing Strategy issues
and generating the possible demand scenario to be faced.
Technological aspects play a key role while solving process plan
problems for the products in the part family. Strategic and
technological data becomes input when a machine tool builder
performs system configuration. The resulting system configurations
are possible solutions that a system user considers when planning
its system capacity.
All the steps of the architecture are deeply studied, developing
methods and tools to address each subproblem. Particular attention
is paid to the methodologies adopted to face the different
subproblems: mathematical programming, stochastic programming,
simulation techniques and inverse kinematics have been used.
The whole architecture provides a general approach to implement
the right degree of flexibility and it allows to study how
different aspects and decisions taken in a firm impact on each
other. The work presented in the book is innovative because it
gives links among different research fields, such as Manufacturing
Strategy, Process Plan, System Design, Capacity Planning and
Performance Evaluation; moreover, it helps to formalize and
rationalize a critical area such as manufacturing system
flexibility.
The addressed problem is relevant at an academic level but,
also, at an industrial level. A great deal ofindustrial sectors
need to address the problem of designing systems with the right
degree of flexibility; for instance, automotive, white goods,
electrical and electronic goods industries, etc.
Attention to industrial issues is confirmed by empirical studies
and real case analyses which are presented within the book
chapters.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!