In the controversy over the reporting of the Falklands conflict,
criticism focused on the media's use of armchair strategists to
interpret and speculate about operations in the South Atlantic.
Valerie Adams sets that media commentary in an historical
perspective and examines its actual content to see whether the
criticism was justified and whether the material actually helped to
inform the public about the actions undertaken on their behalf. The
issues raised in wartime by the relationship between the media, the
government and the public in a democracy are explored: the
Falklands' problems appear insignificant set against potential
future difficulties.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!