Books > Business & Economics > Economics > Microeconomics
|
Buy Now
Rationality, Allocation, and Reproduction (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R5,395
Discovery Miles 53 950
You Save: R840
(13%)
|
|
Rationality, Allocation, and Reproduction (Hardcover, New)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
When the term rational' is used in formal economic theory, a strict
definition is implicit. This strict definition cannot accommodate
the complexities of our everyday ideas of what is rational. The
concept of rationality that is embedded in our language is not a
morally neutral one. It has always been believed possible to argue
rationally about the worthiness of goals, the legitimacy of claim
to rights, the existence of obligations or duties. Outside the
discussions of the social sciences, argument concerning the
rationality of a choice or action is never a purely technical,
value-free discourse.
This book is devoted to an examination of the limitations of the
various formulations and interpretations of the concept of
rationality which has been developed by economic theorists. It
presents a series of challenges to the formal (axiomatic) concept
of rationality. This concept has spread from economics and decision
theory through the social sciences and policy studies. It forms the
implicit foundation for the pronouncement of policy-makers, whose
recommendations can seriously affect the society and environment in
which we live.
The book begins with the claim of neoclassical economics that a
rational agent maximizes utility. Next it considers the later, more
austere construction of rationality where a rational agent was
simply one whose choices or actions were consistent. The discussion
then turns to who, dissatisfied with this bare notion of
consistency, claimed that a rational agent was one whose choices or
actions were directed towards maximization of the agent's
self-interested aims - a view they attributed (misleadingly?) to
Adam Smith. Once the character of the individual agent has been
established, neoclassical theory has always regarded the analysis
of allocation among these agents as its supreme task. This is the
subject of chapters 6 and 7.
Vivian Walsh examines the philosophical implications of the
replacement of the ordinary concept of rationality by the formal
concepts constructed to fit the requirements of general equilibrium
theory, decision theory, and game theory. He argues that the
current intellectual climate, which has moved away from formalism,
necessitates the reexamination of the concepts of rationality which
scholars and policy-makers, many of whom were not economists, were
ready to adopt directly or indirectly from economic theory in the
recent past.
The final two chapters are intended to contrast sharply with the
rest of the book. They offer a readable and minimally technical
account of the much smaller role played by the concept of rational
choice in the work of a present-day school which derives from the
eighteenth- and nineteenth-century classical economists.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.