0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Communication studies > Research methods

Buy Now

Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation - Uses and Abuses (Hardcover) Loot Price: R782
Discovery Miles 7 820
You Save: R62 (7%)
Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation - Uses and Abuses (Hardcover): Yves Gingras

Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation - Uses and Abuses (Hardcover)

Yves Gingras

Series: History and Foundations of Information Science

 (sign in to rate)
List price R844 Loot Price R782 Discovery Miles 7 820 | Repayment Terms: R73 pm x 12* You Save R62 (7%)

Bookmark and Share

Expected to ship within 9 - 15 working days

Why bibliometrics is useful for understanding the global dynamics of science but generate perverse effects when applied inappropriately in research evaluation and university rankings. The research evaluation market is booming. "Ranking," "metrics," "h-index," and "impact factors" are reigning buzzwords. Government and research administrators want to evaluate everything-teachers, professors, training programs, universities-using quantitative indicators. Among the tools used to measure "research excellence," bibliometrics-aggregate data on publications and citations-has become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an "objective" measure of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than "subjective" and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review that have been used since scientific papers were first published in the seventeenth century. In this book, Yves Gingras offers a spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely measuring what they pretend to. Although the study of publication and citation patterns, at the proper scales, can yield insights on the global dynamics of science over time, ill-defined quantitative indicators often generate perverse and unintended effects on the direction of research. Moreover, abuse of bibliometrics occurs when data is manipulated to boost rankings. Gingras looks at the politics of evaluation and argues that using numbers can be a way to control scientists and diminish their autonomy in the evaluation process. Proposing precise criteria for establishing the validity of indicators at a given scale of analysis, Gingras questions why universities are so eager to let invalid indicators influence their research strategy.

General

Imprint: MIT Press
Country of origin: United States
Series: History and Foundations of Information Science
Release date: October 2016
First published: 2016
Authors: Yves Gingras
Dimensions: 229 x 152 x 16mm (L x W x T)
Format: Hardcover - Cloth over boards
Pages: 136
ISBN-13: 978-0-262-03512-5
Categories: Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Communication studies > Coding theory & cryptology
Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Communication studies > Research methods
Books > Social sciences > Education > Organization & management of education > General
LSN: 0-262-03512-X
Barcode: 9780262035125

Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate? Let us know about it.

Does this product have an incorrect or missing image? Send us a new image.

Is this product missing categories? Add more categories.

Review This Product

No reviews yet - be the first to create one!

Partners