Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Communication studies > Research methods
|
Buy Now
Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation - Uses and Abuses (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R782
Discovery Miles 7 820
You Save: R62
(7%)
|
|
Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation - Uses and Abuses (Hardcover)
Series: History and Foundations of Information Science
Expected to ship within 9 - 15 working days
|
Why bibliometrics is useful for understanding the global dynamics
of science but generate perverse effects when applied
inappropriately in research evaluation and university rankings. The
research evaluation market is booming. "Ranking," "metrics,"
"h-index," and "impact factors" are reigning buzzwords. Government
and research administrators want to evaluate everything-teachers,
professors, training programs, universities-using quantitative
indicators. Among the tools used to measure "research excellence,"
bibliometrics-aggregate data on publications and citations-has
become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an "objective" measure
of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than
"subjective" and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review
that have been used since scientific papers were first published in
the seventeenth century. In this book, Yves Gingras offers a
spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on
bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows
that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely
measuring what they pretend to. Although the study of publication
and citation patterns, at the proper scales, can yield insights on
the global dynamics of science over time, ill-defined quantitative
indicators often generate perverse and unintended effects on the
direction of research. Moreover, abuse of bibliometrics occurs when
data is manipulated to boost rankings. Gingras looks at the
politics of evaluation and argues that using numbers can be a way
to control scientists and diminish their autonomy in the evaluation
process. Proposing precise criteria for establishing the validity
of indicators at a given scale of analysis, Gingras questions why
universities are so eager to let invalid indicators influence their
research strategy.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.