|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
In this volume Pierre Duhem first gives an overview of 19th century
electricity and magnetism. Next, he applies his keen historical,
philosophical, and physical intuition to critiquing Maxwell's
theories, especially his electromagnetic theory of light and the ad
hoc introduction of displacement current, which he considers too
much a product of the "esprit de geometrie" than the "esprit de
finesse," as Pascal calls it. In this book, Duhem is guided by the
principle that a theory that offers contradictions, even if the
theory is posed by a genius, needs to be analysed and discussed
until a clear distinction can be made between the propositions
likely to be logically demonstrated and statements that offend
logic and which must be transformed or rejected. Furthermore, Duhem
felt, in criticizing such a theory one must guard against
narrowness of mind and petty corrections which would make one
forget the merit of the inventor; and, more importantly, one must
guard against the blind superstition which, for admiration of the
author, would hide the serious defects of the work. He is not so
great a genius that he surpasses the laws of reason. Pierre Duhem
(1861-1916), chairman of theoretical physics at Bordeaux in
1984-1916, is well-known for his works in the history and
philosophy of science.
In this volume Pierre Duhem first gives an overview of 19th century
electricity and magnetism. Next, he applies his keen historical,
philosophical, and physical intuition to critiquing Maxwell’s
theories, especially his electromagnetic theory of light and the ad
hoc introduction of displacement current, which he considers too
much a product of the “esprit de géométrie” than the
“esprit de finesse,” as Pascal calls it. In this book, Duhem is
guided by the principle that a theory that offers contradictions,
even if the theory is posed by a genius, needs to be analysed and
discussed until a clear distinction can be made between the
propositions likely to be logically demonstrated and statements
that offend logic and which must be transformed or rejected.
Furthermore, Duhem felt, in criticizing such a theory one must
guard against narrowness of mind and petty corrections which would
make one forget the merit of the inventor; and, more importantly,
one must guard against the blind superstition which, for admiration
of the author, would hide the serious defects of the work. He is
not so great a genius that he surpasses the laws of reason. Pierre
Duhem (1861-1916), chairman of theoretical physics at Bordeaux in
1984-1916, is well-known for his works in the history and
philosophy of science.
|
|