|
|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
Alan Charles Raul The devastating and reprehensible acts of
terrorism committed against the 11, 2001 have greatly affected our
lives, our United States on September livelihoods, and perhaps our
way of living. The system of government embodied in our
Constitution and Bill of Rights was designed to inhibit excessively
efficient government. By imposing checks and balances against
over-reaching governmental power, the Founders intended to promote
the rule of laws, not men - and to protect the prerogatives of
citizens over and above their rulers. No faction was to become so
powerful that the rights and interests of any other groups or
individuals could be easily trampled. Specifically, the Framers of
our constitutional structure prohibited the government from
suppressing speech, inhibiting the right of free association, of
people, conducting unreasonable preventing (peaceful) assemblies
searches and seizures, or acting without observing the dictates of
due process and fair play. After September 11, there is a risk that
the philosophical protections of the Constitution could appear more
than a trifle "academic. " Indeed, our tradional notions of "fair
play" will be sorely tested in the context of our compelling
requirements for effective self-defense against brutal, evil
killers who hate the very idea of America. Now that we witness the
grave physical dangers that confront our families, friends,
neighbors, and businesses, our commitment to limited government and
robust individual liberties will of our inevitably - and
understandably - be challenged.
Alan Charles Raul The devastating and reprehensible acts of
terrorism committed against the 11, 2001 have greatly affected our
lives, our United States on September livelihoods, and perhaps our
way of living. The system of government embodied in our
Constitution and Bill of Rights was designed to inhibit excessively
efficient government. By imposing checks and balances against
over-reaching governmental power, the Founders intended to promote
the rule of laws, not men - and to protect the prerogatives of
citizens over and above their rulers. No faction was to become so
powerful that the rights and interests of any other groups or
individuals could be easily trampled. Specifically, the Framers of
our constitutional structure prohibited the government from
suppressing speech, inhibiting the right of free association, of
people, conducting unreasonable preventing (peaceful) assemblies
searches and seizures, or acting without observing the dictates of
due process and fair play. After September 11, there is a risk that
the philosophical protections of the Constitution could appear more
than a trifle "academic. " Indeed, our tradional notions of "fair
play" will be sorely tested in the context of our compelling
requirements for effective self-defense against brutal, evil
killers who hate the very idea of America. Now that we witness the
grave physical dangers that confront our families, friends,
neighbors, and businesses, our commitment to limited government and
robust individual liberties will of our inevitably - and
understandably - be challenged.
|
|