This book presents a selection of revised and updated papers presented in September 2018 at the International Conference 'Rethinking the Crime of Aggression: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives', which was held in Marburg, Germany, and hosted by the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials (ICWC). In light of the activation of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court concerning the crime of aggression, international experts from various disciplines such as law, history, the social sciences, psychology and economics came together to enhance the understanding of this complex and challenging matter and thereby opened a cross-disciplinary dialogue regarding aggressive war and the crime of aggression: a dialogue that not only addresses the historical genesis of the current situation, the content of the new aggression provisions, their implementation in practice and their possible regulatory effects, but also instigates perspectives for investigating future developments and issues. Stefanie Bock is Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, International Criminal Law and Comparative Law in the Department of Law at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials. Eckart Conze is Professor of Modern and Contemporary History in the Department of History at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials.

This book presents a selection of revised and updated papers presented in September 2018 at the International Conference 'Rethinking the Crime of Aggression: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives', which was held in Marburg, Germany, and hosted by the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials (ICWC). In light of the activation of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court concerning the crime of aggression, international experts from various disciplines such as law, history, the social sciences, psychology and economics came together to enhance the understanding of this complex and challenging matter and thereby opened a cross-disciplinary dialogue regarding aggressive war and the crime of aggression: a dialogue that not only addresses the historical genesis of the current situation, the content of the new aggression provisions, their implementation in practice and their possible regulatory effects, but also instigates perspectives for investigating future developments and issues. Stefanie Bock is Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, International Criminal Law and Comparative Law in the Department of Law at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials. Eckart Conze is Professor of Modern and Contemporary History in the Department of History at the Philipps University of Marburg in Germany and Co-Director of the International Research and Documentation Centre for War Crimes Trials.

Die amerikanische Europapolitik der Nachkriegszeit zielte auf Hegemonie durch Integration. Das wurde deutlich, als Charles de Gaulle seit 1958 dem amerikanischen Europakonzept ein franzosisches gegenuberstellte. Daraus ergab sich ein Konflikt zwischen Paris und Washington, der mit der deutschen Innenpolitik am Ende der Ara Adenauer eng verknupft war. Der Autor: Eckart Conze ist seit 1991 wissenschaftlicher Assistent am Seminar fur Zeitgeschichte der Universitat Tubingen. Pressestimmen: "Conzes Studie besticht durch die Darstellung von Integrationserfolgen und Divergenzen unter dem Eindruck einer neuen Bedrohung durch die Sowjetunion, wie man es damals sah. Sie beruht vor allen Dingen auf der Auswertung der US-amerikanischen Akten und vermag insbesondere die Briefwechsel Konrad Adenauers mit dem amerikanischen Prasidenten auszuwerten. ... Eine anregende und solide Studie gegen die Maytifizierung der uberholten Devise Manner machen Politik." (Jost Dulffer, in: Handelsblatt, 5./6.1.1995) "Conze beschreibt und analysiert das Jahr der Atlantiker (1963) mit grosser Klarheit. Und er zeigt, dass in Bonn die Atlantiker uber die Gaullisten (und damit auch uber Adenauer) triumphierten, weil die politische, strategische und okonomische Abhangigkeit dieses in Ost-West-Konflikt hochst gefahrdeten Grenzstaates schliesslich den Ausschlag dafur gab, dass die amerikanische Hegemonie einer franzosischen (oder einer franzosisch-deutschen) vorgezogen wurde," (Werner Link, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8.11.1995)"

This book brings together cutting-edge scholarship from the United States and Europe to address political as well as cultural responses to both the arms race of the 1980s and the ascent of nuclear energy as a second, controversial dimension of the nuclear age. Diverse in its topics and disciplinary approaches, Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear and the Cold War of the 1980s makes a fundamental contribution to the emerging historiography of the 1980s as a whole. As of now, the era's nuclear tensions have been addressed by scholars mostly from the standpoint of security studies, focused on the geo-strategic deliberations of political elites and at the level of state policy. Yet nuclear anxieties, as the essays in this volume document, were so pervasive that they profoundly shaped the era's culture, its habits of mind, and its politics, far beyond the domain of policy.

This book brings together cutting-edge scholarship from the United States and Europe to address political as well as cultural responses to both the arms race of the 1980s and the ascent of nuclear energy as a second, controversial dimension of the nuclear age. Diverse in its topics and disciplinary approaches, Nuclear Threats, Nuclear Fear and the Cold War of the 1980s makes a fundamental contribution to the emerging historiography of the 1980s as a whole. As of now, the era's nuclear tensions have been addressed by scholars mostly from the standpoint of security studies, focused on the geo-strategic deliberations of political elites and at the level of state policy. Yet nuclear anxieties, as the essays in this volume document, were so pervasive that they profoundly shaped the era's culture, its habits of mind, and its politics, far beyond the domain of policy.

Das Pfadfinden als Erziehungs- und Bildungsidee ist uber 100 Jahre alt und heute in mehr als 200 Landern verbreitet. Knoten knupfen, Feuer machen, ein Zeltdorf errichten, den Wald erkunden, auf Fahrt gehen - Kinder und Jugendliche auf der ganzen Welt gestalten ihre Freizeit mit und bei den Pfadfindern. Die padagogischen Grundkonzepte und historischen Wandlungsprozesse dieser weltumspannenden Bewegung wurden jedoch bislang von der Forschung kaum berucksichtigt. Die Autorinnen und Autoren dieses Bandes bundeln mit interdisziplinarem Zugang Wissen und Forschungsergebnisse uber die Pfadfinderbewegung in Deutschland und analysieren die Erziehungs- und Bildungsaktivitaten im Kontext von Lokalitat und Internationalitat. Sie nehmen Geschichte, Gegenwart und Zukunft des Pfadfindens in den Blick und fokussieren sowohl die historische Entwicklung vor dem Hintergrund der Dynamik gesellschaftspolitischer Rahmenbedingungen als auch die Gestaltung zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts.

"