|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
The problem of cost growth in major weapon system acquisition
programs has plagued the Department of Defense for several decades.
This report examines the Air Force experience with should-cost
reviews--a special form of contract cost analysis intended to
identify contractor inefficiencies and lower costs to the
government--and options for enhancing the Air Force's capability to
conduct such reviews.
Are there feasible alternatives to the present "up-or-out" policy
for U.S. military officers? Most military officers are subject to a
policy known as "0up-or-out," which requires separation from
service if they are not promoted or selectively continued within a
certain period of time or when they encounters established
grade/tenure limits. RAND considered a range of potential
substitutes for, or modifications of, the existing policy and
recommends that the Department of Defense implement four
demonstration projects to establish the relative value of specific
policy alternatives and requirements.
Recommends alternative promotion models to address the high turr
over of the military's general and flag officers. The Department of
Defense (DoD) experiences a high turnover from its general and flag
officers (G/FOs). A concern exists that simply lengthening the stay
of senior officers will only clog the system, stagnating promotions
through out the entire officer corps. In response to this, RAND
researchers analyzed the current system, reviewed literature on
corporate management practices, and modeled different ways of
managing G/FOs. In addition to proposing variations to the
promotion model, the authors address the concerns expressed by
those in DoD and Congress about implementing such changes.
The Air Force Medical Service (AFMS) currently runs three
in-theater hospitals for severely injured or wounded personnel.
Part of the practioners' preparation was treating DoD beneficiaries
for a broad range of injuries and illnesses. Opportunities for this
preparation are not as numerous "in house" as they once were, and
AFMS does not always get proper credit for those gained elsewhere.
Proper credit for that work is important for funding.
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.