|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
In the aftermath of the air campaign that began Operation Desert
Storm, the US Air Force sought to measure US success in the
military-technical and organizational innovation that occurred
during the Gulf War and its impact on the future evolution of
military art. From the perspective of the Air Force, the success of
the war was based on planning and execution by the US air and naval
strike forces during the initial aero-space operation, which set
the stage for follow-on air-ground operations. These operations
culminated in the defeat of Iraqi forces in theater and the
liberation of Kuwait with few allied casualties. This success
attracted considerable attention within the US Air Force and led to
the reorganization of US Airpower for the Post-Cold War
environment, which was characterized by local conflicts and
Operations Other Than War. This success led the US Air Force submit
this concept as the "centerpiece" for its input to the Quadrennial
Defense Review of 2001. Air power theorists promoted this emerging
concept as Effects-Based Operations (EBO). EBO emphasized that the
goal of any conflict was to cause the adversary to act in
accordance with US national interests, and that this could be
achieved by the application of superior technology, against
selected targets, to cause an effect. Though this was not a new
concept, EBO was a new means to apply force in military operations.
Over the past decade there has been confusion on what is EBO, its
capabilities and necessity. So where does all the confusion come
from? Is contention by the service components regarding EBO just
petty semantics or obstructionist in-fighting over a "rice bowl"?
The divisive inter-service politics of EBO is utilized to
illuminate certain issues but will not be researched and discussed
in great detail for this monograph. It is unlikely that the Army
will incorporate the term "EBO," but apparently, effects-based
approaches have been, and will continue to be, intertwined within
doctrine and tac
The Life Story, Domains of Identity, and Personality Development in
Emerging Adulthood focuses on individuals' formulations of the
unique episodes and events of their lives that give one meaning and
a sense of personal identity. This book brings the growing research
on narrative study and the life story into focus by drawing from
the existing research on personality development during emerging
adulthood. In this book, authors Michael W. Pratt and M. Kyle
Matsuba present a series of chapters exploring how one's life story
manifests across the many components of their developing identity,
including their religion, morality, vocation, society, and the
relationships they have with their parents, peers, and romantic
partners. Taking their cue from Erik Erikson's model of adolescent
and adult development, the authors show readers exactly how a life
story approach can illuminate the distinctive features of an
individual's personality and development during this formative
phase of life. Organized around a set of life contexts where
personality is manifested (i.e. adjustment, personal ideology,
close relationships, occupation, and civic life), this book draws
on the authors' own longitudinal research on the development of the
life story in emerging adulthood. Throughout the book, they
incorporate fascinating case studies and historical examples (e.g.,
Darwin, Pope Francis, Martin Luther King, Jr., Jane Fonda) of
individuals' unique development during this period of life in order
to better illustrate the application of this approach to
understanding the whole person in context.
|
|