Seminar paper from the year 2003 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: 1,0, University of Hamburg (IAA), course: Seminar II: "George Orwell, the English and the Empire," 8 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this paper we will not mainly focus on an interpretation of the plot of "Shooting an Elephant," but we will rather explore how the elements of the text and hypertexts (such as the narrator and the elephant as well as imperialism) are related and set in opposition to each other within the text. We will basically concentrate on the differences between 4 main carriers of meaning in "Shooting an Elephant" and how these differences differ themselves depending on their constellation to each other. For that we will explore their contradictory as well as their contrary relations to each other. Moreover, we will explore how the central themes dealt with in "Shooting an Elephant" derive from these constellations and how the text transports the ideas of imperialism rooted in the language and especially in the narrative structure which reinforces the idea of 'us' and 'them'. In order to substantiate our findings, we will employ a method called the semiotic square developed by Algirdas Greimas. It will help us to develop the inherent and underlying organisation of this essay through its acting elements and ordering principles. The semiotic square is a tool originating from the text and discourse analysis and as such it hails from structuralism and poststructuralism. Authors such as Frederic Jameson6 have frequently used it to determine how meaning is not only reproduced, but also transmitted through and by a text. Especially transformations from one form of society to another have been realised in narrative texts such as novels or later films. The semiotic square helps to detect these structural embeddings in the text. Consequently, the structure of the current analysis will be as follows: First, we will give a

Magisterarbeit aus dem Jahr 2006 im Fachbereich Soziologie - Klassiker und Theorierichtungen, Note: 1,0, Universitat Hamburg, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Die Theorien Derridas und Luhmanns zu einer zu vereinen ist unmoglich, da beide Ansatze zu verschieden sind. Es bleiben jedoch einzelne frappierende Parallelen, die einen Vergleich nahe legen und die es gilt, naher zu beleuchten. Deswegen kann das Ziel einer Studie wie dieser lediglich sein, die Unterschiede bzw. die Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen Derridas Dekonstruktion und Luhmanns Systemtheorie anzudeuten. Es werden gewisse parallele Perspektiven und Standpunkte gegenubergestellt und erortert. Wenn sich also ein besseres Verstandnis fur die Logik beider Theorieansatze sowie der Ahnlichkeiten und der vergleichbaren Losungsversuche bei den Lesern einstellt, ist das Ziel der Arbeit mehr als erfullt.