|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
The field of operations management is increasingly recognized as
being crucial to the success of a company. The premise of this book
is that learning specific analytical techniques can provide a
deeper understanding of the problems in operations management than
merely reading about these problems. The book is concise while
still providing a broad discussion of the issues and details to
learn these valuable tools.
Each problem area is introduced with an overview of the issues
that must be addressed and the array of tools available to analyze
them. Next, detailed examples are presented. Through these
examples, the ramifications of the various approaches and the
tradeoffs that must be considered when choosing one approach over
another are explored. The book is a valuable resource for
researchers, students, and business practitioners.
This book has a comparatively original theme, or set of themes. It
offers, first, a new way of analysing styles of legal reasoning -
between more 'formal' and more 'substantive' styles. This analysis,
which is worked out in some detail, is a major contribution to
jurisprudence in its own right. The book then goes on to
demonstrate in detail the differences in legal reasoning - and in
the legal systems as a whole - between England and America,
suggesting that the English is a much more 'formal' legal system
and the American a more 'substantive' one. Thirdly, the book
proceeds to explore in detail a wide range of cultural,
institutional, and historical factors relating to the two legal
systems, an exploration which is not only of value for comparative
studies, but also confirms the argument in the first part of the
book as to the relative 'formality' of the two legal systems.
This book has a comparatively original theme, or set of themes. It
offers, first, a new way of analysing styles of legal reasoning -
between more "formal" and more "substantive" styles. This analysis,
which is worked out in some detail, is an important contribution to
jurisprudence in its own right. The book then goes on to
demonstrate in detail the differences in legal reasoning - and in
the legal systems as a whole - between England and America,
suggesting that the English is a much more "formal" legal system
and the American a more "substantive" one. Thirdly, the book
explores in detail a wide range of cultural, institutional, and
historical factors relating to the two legal systems, an
exploration which is not only of value for comparative studies, but
also confirms the argument in the first part of the book as to the
relative "formality" of the two legal systems. A book for Legal
scholars and lawyers in Britain and America; jurists; lawyers in
general and students of comparative law.
|
|