|
Showing 1 - 25 of
34 matches in All Departments
Key Concepts in Philosophy is a series of concise, accessible and
engaging introductions to the core ideas and subjects encountered
in the study of philosophy. Specially written to meet the needs of
students and those with an interest in, but little prior knowledge
of, philosophy, these books open up fascinating, yet sometimes
difficult ideas. The series builds to give a solid grounding in
philosophy and each book is also ideal as a companion to further
study. The philosophical questions raised by the history and
practice of science are among the most complex and stimulating. The
philosophy of science inquires into such matters as scientific
reasoning, scientific explanation, the nature and value of
scientific knowledge, progress in science, and the debate between
realist and anti-realist views of science.
Science has made a huge impact on human society over hundred years,
but how does it work? How do scientists do the things they do? How
do they come up with the theories? How do they test them? How do
they use these theories to explain phenomena? How do they draw
conclusions from them about how the world might be? Now updated,
this second edition of Philosophy of Science: Key Concepts looks at
each of these questions and more. Taking in turn the fundamental
theories, processes and views lying at the heart of the philosophy
of science, this engaging introduction illuminates the scientific
practice and provides a better appreciation of how science actually
works. It features: - Chapters on discovery, evidence, verification
and falsification, realism and objectivity - Accessible overviews
of work of key thinkers such as Galileo, Einstein and Mullis - A
new chapter on explanation - An extended range of easy-to-follow
and contemporary examples to help explain more technical ideas -
Study exercises, an annotated bibliography and suggestions of Where
to Go Next Succinct and approachable, Philosophy of Science: Key
Concepts outlines some of the most central and important scientific
questions, problems and arguments without assuming prior knowledge
of philosophy. This enjoyable introduction is the perfect starting
point for anyone looking to understand how and why science has
shaped and changed our view of the world.
This book (hardcover) is part of the TREDITION CLASSICS. It
contains classical literature works from over two thousand years.
Most of these titles have been out of print and off the bookstore
shelves for decades. The book series is intended to preserve the
cultural legacy and to promote the timeless works of classical
literature. Readers of a TREDITION CLASSICS book support the
mission to save many of the amazing works of world literature from
oblivion. With this series, tredition intends to make thousands of
international literature classics available in printed format again
- worldwide.
This volume builds on two recent developments in philosophy on the
relationship between art and science: the notion of representation
and the role of values in theory choice and the development of
scientific theories. Its aim is to address questions regarding
scientific creativity and imagination, the status of scientific
performances-such as thought experiments and visual aids-and the
role of aesthetic considerations in the context of discovery and
justification of scientific theories. Several contributions focus
on the concept of beauty as employed by practising scientists, the
aesthetic factors at play in science and their role in decision
making. Other essays address the question of scientific creativity
and how aesthetic judgment resolves the problem of theory choice by
employing aesthetic criteria and incorporating insights from both
objectivism and subjectivism. The volume also features original
perspectives on the role of the sublime in science and sheds light
on the empirical work studying the experience of the sublime in
science and its relation to the experience of understanding. The
Aesthetics of Science tackles these topics from a variety of novel
and thought-provoking angles. It will be of interest to researchers
and advanced students in philosophy of science and aesthetics, as
well as other subdisciplines such as epistemology and philosophy of
mathematics.
Quantum gravity is the name given to a theory that unites general
relativity - Einstein's theory of gravitation and spacetime - with
quantum field theory, our framework for describing
non-gravitational forces. The Structural Foundations of Quantum
Gravity brings together philosophers and physicists to discuss a
range of conceptual issues that surface in the effort to unite
these theories, focusing in particular on the ontological nature of
the spacetime that results. Although there has been a great deal
written about quantum gravity from the perspective of physicists
and mathematicians, very little attention has been paid to the
philosophical aspects. This volume closes that gap, with essays
written by some of the leading researchers in the field. Individual
papers defend or attack a structuralist perspective on the
fundamental ontologies of our physical theories, which offers the
possibility of shedding new light on a number of foundational
problems. It is a book that will be of interest not only to
physicists and philosophers of physics but to anyone concerned with
foundational issues and curious to explore new directions in our
understanding of spacetime and quantum physics.
Da Costa and French explore the consequences of adopting a 'pragmatic' notion of truth in the philosophy of science. Their framework sheds new light on issues to do with belief, theory acceptance, and the realism-antirealism debate, as well as the nature of scientific models and their heuristic development.
This volume builds on two recent developments in philosophy on the
relationship between art and science: the notion of representation
and the role of values in theory choice and the development of
scientific theories. Its aim is to address questions regarding
scientific creativity and imagination, the status of scientific
performances-such as thought experiments and visual aids-and the
role of aesthetic considerations in the context of discovery and
justification of scientific theories. Several contributions focus
on the concept of beauty as employed by practising scientists, the
aesthetic factors at play in science and their role in decision
making. Other essays address the question of scientific creativity
and how aesthetic judgment resolves the problem of theory choice by
employing aesthetic criteria and incorporating insights from both
objectivism and subjectivism. The volume also features original
perspectives on the role of the sublime in science and sheds light
on the empirical work studying the experience of the sublime in
science and its relation to the experience of understanding. The
Aesthetics of Science tackles these topics from a variety of novel
and thought-provoking angles. It will be of interest to researchers
and advanced students in philosophy of science and aesthetics, as
well as other subdisciplines such as epistemology and philosophy of
mathematics.
Thinking about Science, Reflecting on Art: Bringing Aesthetics and
Philosophy of Science Together is the first book to systematically
examine the relationship between the philosophy of science and
aesthetics. With contributions from leading figures from both
fields, this edited collection engages with such questions as: Does
representation function in the same way in science and in art? What
important characteristics do scientific models share with literary
fictions? What is the difference between interpretation in the
sciences and in the arts? Can there be a science of aesthetics? In
what ways can aesthetics and philosophy of science be integrated?
Aiming to develop the interconnections between the philosophy of
science and the philosophy of art more broadly and more deeply than
ever before, this volume not only explores scientific
representation by comparison with fiction but extends the scope of
interaction to include metaphysical and other questions around
methodology in mainstream philosophy of science, including the aims
of science, the characterisation of scientific understanding, and
the nature of observation, as well as drawing detailed comparisons
between specific examples in both art and the sciences.
Steven French suggests a radical new approach to the understanding
of quantum physics, derived from Husserl's phenomenological
philosophy. In 1939 two physicists, Fritz London and Edmund Bauer,
published an account of measurement in quantum mechanics. Widely
cited, their 'little book' featured centrally in an important
debate over the role of consciousness in that process. However, it
has been fundamentally misunderstood, both in that debate and
beyond. Steven French argues that London, in particular, approached
the measurement process from the perspective of Husserlian
phenomenology, which he had studied as a student and which he
retained an interest in throughout his career. This casts his work
with Bauer in an entirely novel light and suggests a radical
alternative understanding of quantum mechanics in which
consciousness still plays a role but one that is fundamentally
different than previously conceived. Most interpretations of the
theory approach it on the basis of the so-called 'analytic'
tradition in philosophy. However, there has recently been a surge
of interest in 'continental' approaches and this book offers a
significant new contribution to such developments. Intertwining
history and philosophy, it presents London's background in physics
and phenomenology, together with an outline of the latter as
developed by Husserl, Gurwitsch, Merleau-Ponty and others, as well
as a detailed analysis of the work on measurement with Bauer. The
book concludes by comparing the London and Bauer understanding with
that afforded by Fuch's QBism, Everett's 'Many Worlds'
interpretation and Rovelli's Relational Quantum Mechanics. It is
hoped that this exploratory work will open up new avenues of
thought with regard to one of our most fundamental physical
theories.
In The Structure of the World, Steven French articulates and
defends the bold claim that there are no objects. At the most
fundamental level, modern physics presents us with a world of
structures and making sense of that view is the central aim of the
increasingly widespread position known as structural realism.
Drawing on contemporary work in metaphysics and philosophy of
science, as well as the 'forgotten' history of structural realism
itself, French attempts to further ground and develop this
position. He argues that structural realism offers the best way of
balancing our need to accommodate the results of modern science
with our desire to arrive at an appropriately informed
understanding of the world that science presents to us. Covering
not only the realism-antirealism debate, the nature of
representation, and the relationship between metaphysics and
science, The Structure of the World defends a form of eliminativism
about objects that sets laws and symmetry principles at the heart
of ontology. In place of a world of microscopic objects banging
into one another and governed by the laws of physics, it offers a
world of laws and symmetries, on which determinate physical
properties are dependent. In presenting this account, French also
tackles the distinction between mathematical and physical
structures, the nature of laws, and causality in the context of
modern physics, and he concludes by exploring the extent to which
structural realism can be extended into chemistry and biology.
Quantum theory is widely regarded as one of the most successful
theories in the history of science. It explains a hugely diverse
array of phenomena and is a natural candidate for our best
representation of the world at the level of 'fundamental' physics.
But how can the world be the way quantum theory says it is? It is
famously unclear what the world is like according to quantum
physics, which presents a serious problem for the scientific
realist who is committed to regarding our best theories as more or
less true. The present volume canvasses a variety of responses to
this problem, from restricting or revising realism in different
ways to exploring entirely new directions in the lively debate
surrounding realist interpretations of quantum physics. Some urge
us to focus on new formulations of the theory itself, while others
examine the status of scientific realism in the further context of
quantum field theory. Each chapter is written by a renowned
specialist in the field and is aimed at graduate students and
researchers in both physics and the philosophy of science. Together
they offer a range of illuminating new perspectives on this
fundamental debate and exemplify the fruitful interaction between
physics and philosophy.
There Are No Such Things as Theories considers the fundamental
question: what is a scientific theory? It presents a range of
options - from theories are sets of propositions, to theories are
families of models, abstract artefacts, or fictions - and
highlights the various problems they all face. In so doing it draws
multiple comparisons between theories and artworks: on the one
hand, theories are like certain kinds of paintings with regard to
their representational capacity; on the other, they are like
musical works in that they can be multiply presented. An
alternative answer to the question is then offered, drawing on the
metaphysics of musical works: there are no such things as theories.
Nevertheless, we can still talk about them, since that talk is made
true by the various practices that scientists engage in. The
implications of this form of eliminativism for the realism debate
is then discussed and it is concluded that this may offer a more
flexible framework in which we can understand both the history and
the philosophy of science in general.
Science has made a huge impact on human society over hundred years,
but how does it work? How do scientists do the things they do? How
do they come up with the theories? How do they test them? How do
they use these theories to explain phenomena? How do they draw
conclusions from them about how the world might be? Now updated,
this second edition of Philosophy of Science: Key Concepts looks at
each of these questions and more. Taking in turn the fundamental
theories, processes and views lying at the heart of the philosophy
of science, this engaging introduction illuminates the scientific
practice and provides a better appreciation of how science actually
works. It features: - Chapters on discovery, evidence, verification
and falsification, realism and objectivity - Accessible overviews
of work of key thinkers such as Galileo, Einstein and Mullis - A
new chapter on explanation - An extended range of easy-to-follow
and contemporary examples to help explain more technical ideas -
Study exercises, an annotated bibliography and suggestions of Where
to Go Next Succinct and approachable, Philosophy of Science: Key
Concepts outlines some of the most central and important scientific
questions, problems and arguments without assuming prior knowledge
of philosophy. This enjoyable introduction is the perfect starting
point for anyone looking to understand how and why science has
shaped and changed our view of the world.
How is that when scientists need some piece of mathematics through
which to frame their theory, it is there to hand? What has been
called 'the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics' sets a
challenge for philosophers. Some have responded to that challenge
by arguing that mathematics is essentially anthropocentric in
character, whereas others have pointed to the range of structures
that mathematics offers. Otavio Bueno and Steven French offer a
middle way, which focuses on the moves that have to be made in both
the mathematics and the relevant physics in order to bring the two
into appropriate relation. This relation can be captured via the
inferential conception of the applicability of mathematics, which
is formulated in terms of immersion, inference, and interpretation.
In particular, the roles of idealisations and of surplus structure
in science and mathematics respectively are brought to the fore and
captured via an approach to models and theories that emphasize the
partiality of the available information: the partial structures
approach. The discussion as a whole is grounded in a number of case
studies drawn from the history of quantum physics, and extended to
contest recent claims that the explanatory role of certain
mathematical structures in scientific practice supports a realist
attitude towards them. The overall conclusion is that the
effectiveness of mathematics does not seem unreasonable at all once
close attention is paid to how it is actually applied in practice.
Can quantum particles be regarded as individuals, just like books,
tables and people? According to the 'received' view - articulated
by several physicists in the immediate aftermath of the quantum
revolution - quantum physics itself tells us they cannot: quantum
particles, unlike their classical counterparts, must be regarded as
'non-individuals' in some sense. However, recent work has indicated
that this is not the whole story and that the theory is also
consistent with the position that such particles can be taken to be
individuals, albeit at a metaphysical price.
Drawing on philosophical accounts of identity and individuality, as
well as the histories of both classical and quantum physics, the
authors explore these two alternative metaphysical packages. In
particular, they argue that if quantum particles are regarded as
individuals, then Leibniz's famous Principle of the Identity of
Indiscernibles is in fact violated. Recent discussions of this
conclusion are analysed in detail and, again, the costs involved in
saving the Principle are carefully considered.
Taking the alternative package, the authors deploy recent work in
non-standard logic and set theory to indicate how we can make sense
of the idea that objects can be non-individuals. The concluding
chapter suggests how these results might then be extended to
quantum field theory.
Identity in Physics brings together a range of work in this area
and further develops the authors' own contributions to the debate.
Uniquely, as the title indicates, it situates this work in the
appropriate formal, historical, and philosophical contexts.
Can quantum particles be regarded as individuals, just like books,
tables and people? According to the 'received' view - articulated
by several physicists in the immediate aftermath of the quantum
revolution - quantum physics itself tells us they cannot: quantum
particles, unlike their classical counterparts, must be regarded as
'non-individuals' in some sense. However, recent work has indicated
that this is not the whole story and that the theory is also
consistent with the position that such particles can be taken to be
individuals, albeit at a metaphysical price. Drawing on
philosophical accounts of identity and individuality, as well as
the histories of both classical and quantum physics, the authors
explore these two alternative metaphysical packages. In particular,
they argue that if quantum particles are regarded as individuals,
then Leibniz's famous Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles
is in fact violated. Recent discussions of this conclusion are
analysed in detail and, again, the costs involved in saving the
Principle are carefully considered. Taking the alternative package,
the authors deploy recent work in non-standard logic and set theory
to indicate how we can make sense of the idea that objects can be
non-individuals. The concluding chapter suggests how these results
might then be extended to quantum field theory. Identity in Physics
brings together a range of work in this area and further develops
the authors' own contributions to the debate. Uniquely, as the
title indicates, it situates this work in the appropriate formal,
historical, and philosophical contexts.
Social Work Research and Evaluation applies systematically
developed research knowledge to social work practice and emphasizes
the "doing" of social work as a reciprocal avenue for generating
research evidence and social work knowledge. Using the Examined
Practice Model, authors Elizabeth G. DePoy and Stephen F. Gilson
present research as the identification of a problem and then
proceed to evaluate the efficacy of social work practice in its
resolution. Diverse theories, actions, and sets of evidence from a
range of professional and disciplinary perspectives are included to
underscore the importance of integrating evaluation and practice in
research.
Imagine a place where all your darkest dreams and greatest fears
manifest into reality. Think of abandoned urban streets, shrouded
by rain and fog, where nightmare creatures prowl the everlasting
night in search of human prey. Picture a desolate world ruled by
petty and despotic gods who toy with the lives of mortals as if
they were nothing more than disposable pawns in a cruel game of
salvation and death.
Welcome to Misty Springs, Colorado. Brent Griffis awoke alone one
day to find everyone he knew and loved was gone. What was worse is
that the world had changed into a nightmare landscape populated by
lost souls and desperate bloodthirsty fiends. Then his estranged
wife called asking for help. Could she also be trapped in this
world gone crazy? If so, could he be reunited with his daughter and
all the other missing people he loved? Furthermore, could Brent
survive in a world haunted by an eerie sinister presence?
A Supernatural Thriller & Dark Urban Fantasy
This book is part of the TREDITION CLASSICS. It contains classical
literature works from over two thousand years. Most of these titles
have been out of print and off the bookstore shelves for decades.
The book series is intended to preserve the cultural legacy and to
promote the timeless works of classical literature. Readers of a
TREDITION CLASSICS book support the mission to save many of the
amazing works of world literature from oblivion. With this series,
tredition intends to make thousands of international literature
classics available in printed format again - worldwide.
|
|