![]() |
![]() |
Your cart is empty |
||
Showing 1 - 5 of 5 matches in All Departments
This Norton Critical Edition of Richard III is based on the First Quarto (1597) edition of the play with interpolations from the First Folio (1623). The play is accompanied by a preface, explanatory annotations, A Note on the Text, a list of Textual Variants, and eighteen illustrations of seminal scenes from major dramatic productions and film versions of the play. Contexts provides readers with the sources and analogues that informed Shakespeare s composition of Richard III. These include excerpts from Robert Fabyan s New Chronicles of England and France, Thomas More s The History of King Richard III, Edward Hall s The Union of the Two Noble and Illustre Families of Lancaster and York, A Mirror for Magistrates, and The True Tragedy of Richard III. A selection from Colley Cibber s eighteenth-century adaptation records the compromised form in which Richard III held the stage for approximately two hundred years before twentieth-century editors brought it back into recognizable shape. A representative selection of commentary on stage and film reproductions of Richard III is also provided, ranging from reviews of nineteenth-century productions by William Hazlitt and George Bernard Shaw, a survey of stage performances by Scott Colley, and in-depth analyses of twentieth-century film adaptations by Saskia Kossak, Barbara Hodgdon, and Peter S. Donaldson. Criticism collects eight major pieces of scholarship, including early accounts of the play s major themes by William Richardson and Edward Dowden, modern critical assessments by Wilbur Sanders, Elihu Pearlman, Linda Charnes, Katherine Maus, and Ian Moulton, and an essay by Harry Berger Jr. especially commissioned for this volume. A Selected Bibliography is also included."
This work offers an assessment of appropriations of Shakespeare that respond to the enduring impositions of colonialism. Through a range of readings, Thomas Cartelli illuminates texts and events that position themselves in relation or response to Shakespeare, such as: polemical essays by Walt Whitman; the 19th-century play, "Jack Cade", commissioned and staged by the first major American Shakespeare actor; an essay on labour-management reform by social activist Jane Addams; novels by Aphra Behn, Ngugi Wa Thiong'o, Michelle Cliff, Tayeb Salih, Nadine Gordimer and Robert Stone; the 1849 Astor Place Riot; and a 1916 Shakespeare tercentenary celebration performance at the City College Campus of New York. Divided into three sections, Part One examines US contentions with Shakespeare and argues that they witness a failure to develop models of subjectivity that break from the heroic, and paternalist bias of Shakespearean drama. Part Two focuses on the role of "The Tempest" in postcolonial formulations of power and identity, and the efforts to write postcolonial subjectivities that extend beyond its orbit. Part Three treats the colonial afterlife and postcolonial career of the so-called "O
In the Shakespeare aftermath-where all things Shakespearean are available for reassembly and reenactment-experimental transactions with Shakespeare become consequential events in their own right, informed by technologies of performance and display that defy conventional staging and filmic practices. Reenactment signifies here both an undoing and a redoing, above all a doing differently of what otherwise continues to be enacted as the same. Rooted in the modernist avant-garde, this revisionary approach to models of the past is advanced by theater artists and filmmakers whose number includes Romeo Castellucci, Annie Dorsen, Peter Greenaway, Thomas Ostermeier, Ivo van Hove, and New York's Wooster Group, among others. Although the intermedial turn taken by such artists heralds a virtual future, this book demonstrates that embodiment-in more diverse forms than ever before-continues to exert expressive force in Shakespearean reproduction's turning world.
This study explores the structure of psychological, social and political exchanges that were negotiated between audiences and plays in Elizabethan public theatres in a period ostensibly dominated by Shakespeare, but strongly rooted in Marlowe.
|
![]() ![]() You may like...
|