|
|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
Should transhuman and posthuman persons ever be brought into
existence? And if so, could they be generated in a good and loving
way? This study explores how society may respond to the actual
generation of new kinds of persons from ethical, philosophical, and
theological perspectives. Contributors to this volume address a
number of essential questions, including the ethical ramifications
of generating new life, the relationships that generators may have
with their creations, and how these creations may consider their
generation. This collection's interdisciplinary approach traverses
the philosophical writings of Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant, Nietzsche,
and Heidegger, alongside theological considerations from Jewish,
Christian, and Islamic traditions. It invites academics, faith
leaders, policy makers, and stakeholders to think through the
ethical gamut of generating posthuman and transhuman persons.
As the demand for organs continues to outstrip availability and
waiting lists surge, the pressure to make morally questionable,
unethical decisions becomes more likely and trust in transplant
medicine starts to erode. Medical ethics expert and former health
professional, Trevor Stammers, analyses the complex ethical web
that constitutes the worldwide exchange of organs and tissues. Key
philosophical questions concerning existence, consciousness, the
nature of death and the right to life connect organ donation and
transplantation to real-life case studies exploring difficulties
with the 'dead donor rule' for deceased donation, organ donation
euthanasia, xenotransplantation and the creation of organoids and
'organs-on-chips', alongside examples of human trafficking and
systematic state murder to provide organs. Controversial cases from
Japan, Germany, USA and Singapore are examined alongside the
Spanish, Welsh, and Chilean experience of deceased donation opt-out
schemes to highlight the variety of threats and challenges to
public trust in transplant medicine. Charting these examples
provides valuable material for debates and discussions in the
philosophy of medicine and medical ethics more generally. Stammers
suggests viable alternatives to current ethical failings by
focusing on the moral arguments that define public trust, moving
the debate on transplant ethics in vital new directions.
Should transhuman and posthuman persons ever be brought into
existence? And if so, could they be generated in a good and loving
way? This study explores how society may respond to the actual
generation of new kinds of persons from ethical, philosophical, and
theological perspectives. Contributors to this volume address a
number of essential questions, including the ethical ramifications
of generating new life, the relationships that generators may have
with their creations, and how these creations may consider their
generation. This collection's interdisciplinary approach traverses
the philosophical writings of Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant, Nietzsche,
and Heidegger, alongside theological considerations from Jewish,
Christian, and Islamic traditions. It invites academics, faith
leaders, policy makers, and stakeholders to think through the
ethical gamut of generating posthuman and transhuman persons.
As the demand for organs continues to outstrip availability and
waiting lists surge, the pressure to make morally questionable,
unethical decisions becomes more likely and trust in transplant
medicine starts to erode. Medical ethics expert and former health
professional, Trevor Stammers, analyses the complex ethical web
that constitutes the worldwide exchange of organs and tissues. Key
philosophical questions concerning existence, consciousness, the
nature of death and the right to life connect organ donation and
transplantation to real-life case studies exploring difficulties
with the 'dead donor rule' for deceased donation, organ donation
euthanasia, xenotransplantation and the creation of organoids and
'organs-on-chips', alongside examples of human trafficking and
systematic state murder to provide organs. Controversial cases from
Japan, Germany, USA and Singapore are examined alongside the
Spanish, Welsh, and Chilean experience of deceased donation opt-out
schemes to highlight the variety of threats and challenges to
public trust in transplant medicine. Charting these examples
provides valuable material for debates and discussions in the
philosophy of medicine and medical ethics more generally. Stammers
suggests viable alternatives to current ethical failings by
focusing on the moral arguments that define public trust, moving
the debate on transplant ethics in vital new directions.
|
|