|
Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence > War & defence operations > Civil war
Why put Abraham Lincoln, the sometime corporate lawyer and American
President, in dialogue with Karl Marx, the intellectual
revolutionary? On the surface, they would appear to share few
interests. Yet, though Lincoln and Marx never met one another, both
had an abiding interest in the most important issue of the
nineteenth-century Atlantic world-the condition of labor in a
capitalist world, one that linked slave labor in the American south
to England's (and continental Europe's) dark satanic mills. Each
sought solutions-Lincoln through a polity that supported free men,
free soil, and free labor; Marx by organizing the working class to
resist capitalist exploitation. While both men espoused
emancipation for American slaves, here their agreements ended.
Lincoln thought that the free labor society of the American North
provided great opportunities for free men missing from the American
South, a kind of "farm ladder" that gave every man the ability to
become a landowner. Marx thought such "free land" a chimera and
(with information from German-American correspondents), was certain
that the American future lay in the proletarianized cities. Abraham
Lincoln and Karl Marx in Dialogue intersperses short selections
from the two writers from their voluminous works, opening with an
introduction that puts the ideas of the two men in the broad
context of nineteenth-century thought and politics. The volume
excerpts Lincoln's and Marx's views on slavery (they both opposed
it for different reasons), the Civil War (Marx claimed the war
concerned slavery and should have as its goal abolition; Lincoln
insisted that his goal was just the defeat of the Confederacy), and
the opportunities American free men had to gain land and economic
independence. Through this volume, readers will gain a firmer
understanding of nineteenth-century labor relations throughout the
Atlantic world: slavery and free labor; the interconnections
between slave-made cotton and the exploitation of English
proletarians; and the global impact of the American Civil War.
Orwell's personal account of his experiences and observations in
the Spanish Civil War.
At the start of the Civil War, Knoxville, Tennessee, with a
population of just over 4,000, was considered a prosperous
metropolis little reliant on slavery. Although the surrounding
countryside was predominantly Unionist in sympathy, Knoxville
itself was split down the middle, with Union and Confederate
supporters even holding simultaneous political rallies at opposite
ends of the town's main street. Following Tennessee's secession,
Knoxville soon became famous (or infamous) as a stronghold of
stalwart Unionism, thanks to the efforts of a small cadre who
persisted in openly denouncing the Confederacy. Throughout the
course of the Civil War, Knoxville endured military occupation for
all but three days, hosting Confederate troops during the first
half of the conflict and Union forces throughout the remainder,
with the transition punctuated by an extended siege and bloody
battle during which nearly forty thousand soldiers fought over the
town.
In Lincolnites and Rebels, Robert Tracy McKenzie tells the story
of Civil War Knoxville-a perpetually occupied, bitterly divided
Southern town where neighbor fought against neighbor. Mining a
treasure-trove of manuscript collections and civil and military
records, McKenzie reveals the complex ways in which allegiance
altered the daily routine of a town gripped in a civil war within
the Civil War and explores the agonizing personal decisions that
war made inescapable. Following the course of events leading up to
the war, occupation by Confederate and then Union soldiers, and the
troubled peace that followed the war, Lincolnites and Rebels
details in microcosm the conflict and paints a complex portrait of
a border state, neither wholly North norSouth.
Finalist, Jefferson Davis Award, Museum of the Confederacy
In a groundbreaking examination of the antislavery origins of
liberal Protestantism, Molly Oshatz contends that the antebellum
slavery debates forced antislavery Protestants to adopt an
historicist understanding of truth and morality. Unlike earlier
debates over slavery, the antebellum slavery debates revolved
around the question of whether or not slavery was a sin in the
abstract. Unable to use the letter of the Bible to answer the
proslavery claim that slavery was not a sin in and of itself,
antislavery Protestants, including William Ellery Channing, Francis
Wayland, Moses Stuart, Leonard Bacon, and Horace Bushnell, argued
that biblical principles opposed slavery and that God revealed
slavery's sinfulness through the gradual unfolding of these
principles. Although they believed that slavery was a sin,
antislavery Protestants' sympathy for individual slaveholders and
their knowledge of the Bible made them reluctant to denounce all
slaveholders as sinners. In order to reconcile slavery's sinfulness
with their commitments to the Bible and to the Union, antislavery
Protestants defined slavery as a social rather than an individual
sin. Oshatz demonstrates that the antislavery notions of
progressive revelation and social sin had radical implications for
Protestant theology. Oshatz carries her study through the Civil War
to reveal how emancipation confirmed for northern Protestants the
antislavery notion that God revealed His will through history. She
describes how after the war, a new generation of liberal
theologians, including Newman Smyth, Charles Briggs, and George
Harris, drew on the example of antislavery and emancipation to
respond to evolution and historical biblical criticism. The
theological innovations rooted in the slavery debates came to
fruition in liberal Protestantism's acceptance of the historical
and evolutionary nature of religious truth.
Explore the Civil War history of West Virginia's Coal River Valley.
The American Civil War shaped the course of the country's history
and its national identity. This is no less true for the state of
Arkansas. Throughout the Natural State, people have paid homage and
remembrance to those who fought and what was fought for in memorial
celebrations and rituals. The memory of the war has been kept alive
by reunions and preservationists, continuing to shape the way the
War Between the States affects Arkansas and its people. Historian
W. Stuart Towns expertly tells the story of Arkansas's Civil War
heritage through its rituals of memorial, commemoration and
celebration that continue today.
It is the most famous speech Lincoln ever gave, and one of the most
important orations in the history of the nation. Delivered on
November 19, 1863, among the freshly dug graves of the Union dead,
the Gettysburg Address defined the central meaning of the Civil War
and gave cause for the nation's incredible suffering. The poetic
language and moral sentiment inspired listeners at the time, and
have continued to resonate powerfully with groups and individuals
up to the present day. What gives this speech its enduring
significance? This collection of essays, from some of the
best-known scholars in the field, answers that question. Placing
the Address in complete historical and cultural context and
approaching it from a number of fresh perspectives, the volume
first identifies how Lincoln was influenced by great thinkers on
his own path toward literary and oratory genius. Among others,
Nicholas P. Cole draws parallels between the Address and classical
texts of Antiquity and John Stauffer considers Lincoln's knowledge
of the King James Bible and Shakespeare. The second half of the
collection then examines the many ways in which the Gettysburg
Address has been interpreted, perceived, and utilized in the past
150 years. Since 1863, African Americans, immigrants, women, gay
rights activists, and international figures have invoked the
speech's language and righteous sentiments on their respective
paths toward freedom and equality. Essays include Louis P. Masur on
the role the Address played in eventual emancipation; Jean H. Baker
on the speech's importance to the women's rights movement; and Don
H. Doyle on the Address's international legacy. Lincoln spoke at
Gettysburg in a defining moment for America, but as the essays in
this collection attest, his message is universal and timeless. This
work brings together the foremost experts in the field to
illuminate the many ways in which that message continues to endure.
Desperate to seize control of Kentucky, the Confederate army
launched an invasion into the commonwealth in the fall of 1862,
viciously culminating at an otherwise quiet Bluegrass crossroads
and forever altering the landscape of the war. The Battle of
Perryville lasted just one day yet produced nearly eight thousand
combined casualties and losses, and some say nary a victor. The
Rebel army was forced to retreat, and the United States kept its
imperative grasp on Kentucky throughout the war. Few know this
hallowed ground like Christopher L. Kolakowski, former director of
the Perryville Battlefield Preservation Association, who draws on
letters, reports, memoirs and other primary sources to offer the
most accessible and engaging account of the Kentucky Campaign yet,
featuring over sixty historic images and maps.
Leonidas Polk is one of the most fascinating figures of the Civil
War. Consecrated as a bishop of the Episcopal Church and
commissioned as a general into the Confederate army, Polk's life in
both spheres blended into a unique historical composite. Polk was a
man with deep religious convictions but equally committed to the
Confederate cause. He baptized soldiers on the eve of bloody
battles, administered last rites and even presided over officers'
weddings, all while leading his soldiers into battle. Historian
Cheryl White examines the life of this soldier-saint and the legacy
of a man who unquestionably brought the first viable and lively
Protestant presence to Louisiana and yet represents the politics of
one of the darkest periods in American history.
On July 11, 1864, some residents cheered and others watched in
horror as Confederate troops spread across the fields and orchards
of Silver Spring, Maryland. Many fled to the capital while General
Jubal Early's troops ransacked their property. The estate of
Lincoln's postmaster general, Montgomery Blair, was burned, and his
father's home was used by Early as headquarters from which to
launch an attack on Washington's defenses. Yet the first Civil War
casualty in Silver Spring came well before Early's raid, when Union
soldiers killed a prominent local farmer in 1862. This was life in
the shadow of the Federal City. Drawing on contemporary accounts
and memoirs, Dr. Robert E. Oshel tells the story of Silver Spring
over the tumultuous course of the Civil War.
A military operation unlike any other on American soil, Morgan's
Raid was characterized by incredible speed, superhuman endurance
and innovative tactics. One of the nation's most colorful leaders,
Confederate general John Hunt Morgan, took his cavalry through
enemy-occupied territory in three states in one of the longest
offensives of the Civil War. The effort produced the only battles
fought north of the Ohio River and reached farther north than any
other regular Confederate force. With twenty-five maps and more
than forty illustrations, Morgan's Raid historian David L. Mowery
takes a new look at this unprecedented event in American history,
one historians rank among the world's greatest land-based raids
since Elizabethan times.
Too far north, the great state of Maine did not witness any Civil
War battles. However, Mainers contributed to the war in many
important ways. From the mainland to the islands, soldiers bravely
fought to preserve the United States in all major battles. Men like
General Joshua Chamberlain, a hero of Little Round Top, proudly
returned home to serve as governor. Maine native Hannibal Hamlin
served as Abraham Lincoln's first vice president. And Maine's
strong women sacrificed and struggled to maintain their communities
and support the men who had left to fight. Author Harry Gratwick
diligently documents the stories of these Mainers, who preserved
"The Way Life Should Be" for Maine and the entire United States.
Virginia's Shenandoah Valley was known as the "Breadbasket of the
Confederacy" due to its ample harvests and transportation centers,
its role as an avenue of invasion into the North and its capacity
to serve as a diversionary theater of war. The region became a
magnet for both Union and Confederate armies during the Civil War,
and nearly half of the thirteen major battles fought in the valley
occurred as part of General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson's 1862
Valley Campaign. Civil War historian Jonathan A. Noyalas examines
Jackson's Valley Campaign and how those victories brought hope to
an infant Confederate nation, transformed the lives of the
Shenandoah Valley's civilians and emerged as Stonewall Jackson's
defining moment.
Told here for the first time is the compelling story of the Bluff
City during the Civil War. Historian and preservationist Mike Bunn
takes you from the pivotal role Eufaula played in Alabama's
secession and early enthusiasm for the Confederate cause to its
aborted attempt to become the state's capital and its ultimate
capture by Union forces, chronicling the effects of the conflict on
Eufaulans along the way. "Civil War Eufaula "draws on a wide range
of firsthand individual perspectives, including those of husbands
and wives, political leaders, businessmen, journalists, soldiers,
students and slaves, to produce a mosaic of observations on shared
experiences. Together, they communicate what it was like to live in
this riverside trading town during a prolonged and cataclysmic war.
It is the story of ordinary people in extraordinary times.
Tennessee's Thirteenth Union Cavalry was a unit composed mostly of
amateur soldiers that eventually turned undisciplined boys into
seasoned fighters. At the outbreak of the Civil War, East Tennessee
was torn between its Unionist tendencies and the surrounding
Confederacy. The result was the persecution of the "home Yankees"
by Confederate sympathizers. Rather than quelling Unionist fervor,
this oppression helped East Tennessee contribute an estimated
thirty thousand troops to the North. Some of those troops joined
the "Loyal Thirteenth" in Stoneman's raid and in pursuit of
Confederate president Jefferson Davis. Join author Melanie Storie
as she recounts the harrowing narrative of an often-overlooked
piece of Civil War history.
In the early days of the Civil War, Richmond was declared the
capital of the Confederacy, and until now, countless stories from
its tenure as the Southern headquarters have remained buried. Mary
E. Walker, a Union doctor and feminist, was once held captive in
the city for refusing to wear proper women's clothing. A coffee
substitute factory exploded under intriguing circumstances. Many
Confederate soldiers, when in the trenches of battle, thumbed
through the pages of Hugo's "Les Miserables." Author Brian Burns
reveals these and many more curious tales of Civil War Richmond.
When Louisiana seceded from the Union on January 26, 1861, no one
doubted that a battle to control the Mississippi River was
imminent. Throughout the war, the Federals pushed their way up the
river. Every port and city seemed to fall against the force of the
Union Navy. The capitol was forced to retreat from Baton Rouge to
Shreveport. Many of the smaller towns, like Bayou Sara and
Donaldsonville, were nearly shelled completely off the map. It was
not until the Union reached Port Hudson that the Confederates had a
fighting chance to keep control of the mighty Mississippi. They
fought long and hard, under supplied and under manned, but
ultimately the Union prevailed.
The Battle of Fredericksburg is known as the most disastrous defeat
the Federal Army of the Potomac experienced in the American Civil
War. The futile assaults by Federal soldiers against the
Confederate defensive positions on Marye's Heights and behind the
infamous stone wall along the "Sunken Road" solidified Ambrose
Burnside's reputation as an inept army commander and reinforced
Robert E. Lee's undefeatable image. Follow historian James Bryant
behind the lines of confrontation to discover the strategies and
blunders that contributed to one of the most memorable battles of
the Civil War.
Lord Derby, Lancashire's highest-ranked nobleman and its principal
royalist, once offered the opinion that the English civil wars had
been a 'general plague of madness'. Complex and bedevilling, the
earl defied anyone to tell the complete story of 'so foolish, so
wicked, so lasting a war'. Yet attempting to chronicle and to
explain the events is both fascinating and hugely important.
Nationally and at the county level the impact and significance of
the wars can hardly be over-stated: the conflict involved our
ancestors fighting one another, on and off, for a period of nine
years; almost every part of Lancashire witnessed warfare of some
kind at one time or another, and several towns in particular saw
bloody sieges and at least one episode characterised as a massacre.
Nationally the wars resulted in the execution of the king; in 1651
the Earl of Derby himself was executed in Bolton in large measure
because he had taken a leading part in the so-called massacre in
that town in 1644.In the early months of the civil wars many could
barely distinguish what it was that divided people in 'this war
without an enemy', as the royalist William Waller famously wrote;
yet by the end of it parliament had abolished monarchy itself and
created the only republic in over a millennium of England's
history. Over the ensuing centuries this period has been described
variously as a rebellion, as a series of civil wars, even as a
revolution. Lancashire's role in these momentous events was quite
distinctive, and relative to the size of its population
particularly important. Lancashire lay right at the centre of the
wars, for the conflict did not just encompass England but Ireland
and Scotland too, and Lancashire's position on the coast facing
Catholic, Royalist Ireland was seen as critical from the very first
months.And being on the main route south from Scotland meant that
the county witnessed a good deal of marching and marauding armies
from the north. In this, the first full history of the Lancashire
civil wars for almost a century, Stephen Bull makes extensive use
of new discoveries to narrate and explain the exciting, terrible
events which our ancestors witnessed in the cause either of king or
parliament. From Furness to Liverpool, and from the Wyre estuary to
Manchester and Warrington...civil war actions, battles, sieges and
skirmishes took place in virtually every corner of Lancashire.
|
|