|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political ideologies > General
Democracy in Europe is about the impact of European integration on
national democracies. It argues that the oft-cited democratic
deficit is indeed a problem, but not so much at the level of the
European Union per se as at the national level. This is because
national leaders and publics have
yet to come to terms with the institutional impact of the EU on the
traditional workings of their national democracies.
The book begins with a discussion of what the EU is-a new form of
'regional state' in which sovereignty is shared, boundaries are
variable, identity composite, and democracy fragmented. It then
goes on to examine the effects of this on EU member-states'
institutions and ideas about democracy,
finding that institutional 'fit' matters. The 'compound' EU, in
which governing activity is highly dispersed among multiple
authorities, is more disruptive to 'simple' polities like Britain
and France, where governing activity has traditionally been more
concentrated in a single authority, than to
similarly 'compound' polities like Germany and Italy.
But the book concludes that the real problem for member-states is
not so much that their practices have changed as that national
ideas and discourse about democracy have not. The failure has been
one of the 'communicative' discourse to the general public-which
again has been more pronounced for
simple polities, despite their potentially greater capacity to
communicate through a single voice, than for compound polities,
where the 'coordinative' discourse among policy actors
predominates.
Utilizing hitherto unexplored material that has become available
only after the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, this book examines
the Monist philosophy of the German zoologist Ernst Haeckel, and
its role in stimulating the birth of Fascist ideology in Italy and
France. Focusing on the relevance of evolutionary science, Fascist
thought is revealed as intimately related to Haeckel's scientific
Monism -- an approach that differs from most interpretations that
tend to voice skepticism about the existence of a specific
intellectual origin for Fascist ideology.
Forty years before COVID-19, socialists in Britain campaigned for
workers to have the right to make 'socially useful' products, from
hospital equipment to sustain the NHS to affordable heating systems
for the impoverished elderly. This movement held one thing
responsible above all else for the nation's problems: the burden of
defence spending. In the middle of the Cold War, the left put a
direct challenge to the defence industry, the Labour government and
trade unions. The response it received revealed much about a
military-industrial state that prioritised the making and exporting
of arms for political favour and profit. Looking at peace activism
from the early 1970s to Labour's landslide defeat in the 1983
general election, this book examines the conflict over the cost of
Britain's commitment to the Cold War and asserts that the wider
left presented a comprehensive and implementable alternative to the
stark choice between making weapons and joining the dole queue. --
.
Populism is a powerful force today, but its full scope has eluded
the analytical tools of both orthodox and heterodox 'populism
studies'. This book provides a valuable alternative perspective. It
reconstructs in detail for the first time the sociological analyses
of US demagogues by members of the Frankfurt School and compares
these with contemporary approaches. Modern demagogy emerges as a
key under-researched feature of populism, since populist movements,
whether 'left' or 'right', are highly susceptible to 'demagogic
capture'. The book also details the culture industry's populist
contradictions - including its role as an incubator of modern
demagogues - from the 1930s through to today's social media and
'Trumpian psychotechnics'. Featuring a previously unpublished text
by Adorno on modern demagogy as an appendix, it will be of interest
to everyone concerned about the rise of demagogic populism today.
-- .
This book deals with the main doctrines of Marxist politics.
Clearly and simply written, the book explores the views of
classical Marxists along with the findings of Western and
Analytical Marxists. It also shows a distinction between Marxist
and non-Marxist views on politics. Their points of difference as
well as their common roots are thus clearly accounted for. Marxist
politics is a coherent system of ideas and theories of class, class
struggle, party, revolution and the state developed in response to
a series of major and interrelated changes - the emergence of a
capitalist economy, the rise of the modern nation-state and the
development of modern science, which transformed both the society
and politics. This book is intended to explore these ideas and
theories. Particular emphasis has been put on the ideas and views
of critical Marxists in a separate chapter. The book includes brief
bibliographical details of major individual thinkers as well as an
annotated bibliography for further reading. Print edition not for
sale in South Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan
and Bhutan)
Peter Shore worked under Hugh Gaitskell, serving in successive
Labour Cabinets under first Harold Wilson and subsequently James
Callaghan. He wrote the 1964, 1966 and 1970 general election
manifestos for the party and stood in both the 1980 and the 1983
party leadership elections. He would go on to be known as one of
the Labour Party's most important thinkers. He had a long political
career at the upper levels of the Labour Party and was close to
successive leaders. Despite this, he was also independent minded,
as evidenced by the 1976 IMF crisis and his long-standing
opposition to European integration. As well as this key debate, the
authors also address crucial issues within the Labour movement,
from macroeconomic management to the extent to which the party can
be a force for socialism. This remarkable new study offers a
comprehensive and timely reappraisal of the man and his record,
examining the context within which he operated, his approach and
responses to changing social and economic norms, his opposition to
Britain's membership of what is now the EU, and how he was viewed
by peers from across the political spectrum. Finally, it examines
the overall impact of Peter Shore on the development of British
politics. With contributions from leading experts in the fields of
political theory, and from Shore's own contemporaries, this book is
an important new assessment of one of Labour's most interesting
political thinkers in twentieth-century British politics.
'Capitalism may be teetering once again on the edge of a terminal
crisis, but there are no gravediggers in sight. This time around
not only are there no gravediggers there are no longer any rival
economic systems either ...' In 'The Western Ideology' Andrew
Gamble demonstrates the contradictions and the resilience of the
doctrines that define liberal modernity, and examines the
contemporary possibilities for dissent and change. This volume
brings together for the first time this seminal essay with a
collection of Andrew Gamble's writings on political ideas and
ideologies, which have been chosen by the author to illustrate the
main themes of his writing in intellectual history and the history
of ideas. Themes include the character of economic liberalism and
neoliberalism, especially as expressed in the work of Friedrich
Hayek, as well as critiques from both social democratic and
conservative perspectives and from critics as varied as Karl Marx,
Michael Oakeshott and Bob Dylan. The collection includes a new
autobiographical introduction, notes on the essays and an epilogue
putting the essays into the context of today's society. Andrew
Gamble provides a unique exploration of the debates and the ideas
that have shaped our politics and Western ideology. A companion
volume of Andrew Gamble's essays, After Brexit and Other Essays,
focusing on political economy and British politics, is also
available from Bristol University Press.
It is commonplace that the modern world is more international than
at any point in human history. Yet the sheer profusion of terms for
describing politics beyond the nation state-including
"international," "European," "global," "transnational" and
"cosmopolitan," among others - is but one indication of how
conceptually complex this field actually is. Taking a wide view of
internationalism(s) in Europe since the eighteenth century,
Nationalism and Internationalism Intertwined explores discourses
and practices to challenge nation-centered histories and trace the
entanglements that arise from international cooperation. A
multidisciplinary group of scholars in history, discourse studies
and digital humanities asks how internationalism has been
experienced, understood, constructed, debated and redefined across
different European political cultures as well as related to the
wider world.
Hate Groups: A Reference Handbook offers answers to essential
questions about hate groups in a way that is accessible to students
and general readers interested in this important topic. Hate
Groups: A Reference Handbook covers the topic of hate groups from
the earliest pages of human history to the present day. Chapters
One and Two provide a historical background of the topic and a
review of current problems, controversies, and solutions. The
remainder of the book consists of chapters that aid readers in
continuing their research on the topic, such as an extended
annotated bibliography, a chronology, a glossary, lists of
noteworthy individuals and organizations in the field, and
important data and documents. The variety of resources provided,
such as further reading, perspective essays about hate groups, a
historical timeline, and useful terms in the field, differentiates
this book from others of its kind. It is intended for readers of
high school through the community college level, along with adult
readers who may be interested in the topic. Provides readers with a
history of hate groups, which have evolved significantly over the
years Discusses the role of seemingly "neutral" organizations in
promoting the efforts of hate groups Supplies abundant resources
for further research on hate groups by readers of all ages Rounds
out the author's expertise with perspective essays, giving readers
a diversity of viewpoints on the topic
The COVID-19 pandemic, Black Lives Matter movement and renewed
action against climate change all highlight the increasing gulf
between narrowly based dominant political ideologies and popular
demands for social justice, global health, environmentalism and
human rights. This book examines for the first time the
exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies. Bringing
together theory, practice and the relationship between
participation, political ideology and social welfare, it offers a
detailed critique of how the crucial move to more participatory
approaches may be achieved. It is concerned with valuing people's
knowledge and experience in relation to ideology, exploring its
conventional social construction including counter ideology and the
ideological underpinnings and relations of participation. It also
offers a practical guide for change.
This book examines the period of political violence in Turkey
between 12 March 1971 and 12 September 1980. It sets out a close
analysis of the tactics used by the various protagonists in the
conflict, showing how they took over public institutions, the first
of which was the police. This book challenges the myth of a
'strong' Turkish state viewed as authoritative and autonomous from
society, instead reflecting a state that was unable to contain the
political mobilisation actually taking place. In the book, Benjamin
Gourisse analyses the structure, mobilisation, and strategies of
antagonistic radical political groups caught up in this dynamic of
violence, including the far-left organisations and the Nationalist
Movement, comprising the Nationalist Movement Party and its
satellite organisations. Gourisse demonstrates that from 1975 to
1980, the state was never "out of play". Quite the contrary, in
fact, for its institutions, together with the practices, beliefs,
and representations of their members and users, were central to the
processes constituting the crisis.
Describing the Islamic State's ideologues as 'entrepreneurs of
identity', this book explores how the group defined categories of
social identity and used them as tools of communicative and
cognitive structuring. Based on a wide dossier of original texts,
speeches, images, and videos, the book examines how these
ideologues have built a symbolic repertoire around the black flag
as well as ideas and social practices such as the dictum to command
good and forbid wrong, the supervision of public behaviour, and the
oath of allegiance to the Caliph.
This edited collection explores the role of Euroscepticism in the
European Parliament (EP) elections of 2014 both in particular EU
Member States and across broader regions. It shows how the "second
rate" features of elections with no clear agenda-setting role
facilitated the astonishing success of Eurosceptic parties while
the traditionally "second order" nature of purely legislative
elections amplified this outcome, giving it a quite different
character than the outcome of any previous EP elections, with
potential in turn to affect outcomes of later national elections as
well. The chapters draw on a number of different methodological
approaches and focus on different perspectives regarding how
Euroscepticism played a role in the election context, investigating
public opinion, party strategies and media coverage; and assessing
how these elections created links to national party politics with
likely consequences for electoral success of Eurosceptic parties in
future national elections and referendums. This book will be of
particular interest to students and scholars in the fields of
European politics, voting behavior Euroscepticism.
Unique in comparative scope, this volume brings together global
scholarship on gender. Thirteen international experts explore the
gendered mobilization of men and women in twentieth century
European and Asian mass dictatorships and colonial empires,
examining both mobilization 'from above' and self-empowerment 'from
below'.
This book takes a distinctive and innovative approach to a
relatively under-explored question, namely: Why do we have human
rights? Much political discourse simply proceeds from the idea that
humans have rights because they are human without seriously
interrogating this notion. Egalitarian Rights Recognition offers an
account of how human rights are created and how they may be seen to
be legitimate: rights are created through social recognition. By
combining readings of 19th Century English philosopher T.H. Green
with 20th Century political theorist Hannah Arendt, the author
constructs a new theory of the social recognition of rights. He
challenges both the standard 'natural rights' approach and also the
main accounts of the social recognition of rights which tend to
portray social recognition as settled norms or established ways of
acting. In contrast, Hann puts forward a 10-point account of the
dynamic and contingent social recognition of human rights, which
emphasises the importance of meaningful socio-economic equality.
A NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER CHOSEN AS A BOOK OF THE YEAR BY THE
GUARDIAN, NEW STATESMAN AND THE IRISH TIMES 'Illuminating and
entertaining . . . while the world seems to counsel despair, The
Persuaders is animated by a sense of possibility' The New York
Times The lifeblood of any free society is persuasion: changing
other people's minds to enable real change. But America is
suffering a crisis of faith in persuasion that is putting its
democracy and the planet itself at risk. People increasingly write
each other off instead of seeking to win each other over. Debates
are framed in moralistic terms, with enemies battling the
righteous. Movements for justice build barriers to entry, instead
of on-ramps. Political parties focus on mobilizing the faithful
rather than wooing the sceptical. And leaders who seek to forge
coalition are labelled sell-outs. In The Persuaders best-selling
author Anand Giridharadas takes us inside these movements and
battles, seeking out the dissenters who continue to champion
persuasion in an age of polarization. We meet a co-founder of Black
Lives Matter; a leader of the feminist resistance to Trumpism;
white parents at a seminar on raising adopted children of colour;
Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; a team of door
knockers with an uncanny formula for changing minds on immigration;
and an ex-cult member turned QAnon deprogrammer. As they grapple
with how to "call out" threats and injustices while "calling in"
those who don't agree with them but just might one day, they point
a way to healing, and changing, a broken society.
What does 'autonomy' mean today? Is the Enlightenment understanding
of autonomy still relevant for contemporary challenges? How have
the limits and possibilities of autonomy been transformed by recent
developments in artificial intelligence and big data, political
pressures, intersecting oppressions and the climate emergency? The
challenges to autonomy today reach across society with
unprecedented complexity, and in this book leading scholars from
philosophy, economics, linguistics, literature and politics examine
the role of autonomy in key areas of contemporary life, forcefully
defending a range of different views about the nature and extent of
resistance to autonomy today. These essays are essential reading
for anyone who wants to understand the predicament and prospects of
one of modernity's foundational concepts and one of our most widely
cherished values.
This work explains elite behaviour in authoritarian systems and
proposes why elites withdraw their support for the incumbent when
faced with popular uprisings. Building upon foundations drawn from
institutional authoritarianism and synthesised with local context
from the substantial scholarship on the Middle East and North
Africa, the book argues that the elite supporting autocrats come
from three distinct cadres: the military, the single-party and the
personalist. Each of these cadres possesses its own distinct
institutional interests and preferences towards regime change.
Drawing on these interests, the study constructs a theoretical
framework that is assessed through testing it against three
variables. Utilising an analytic narrative, the research finds that
the withdrawal of elite support is the consequence of long-term
processes that see distinct cadres marginalised. First, increased
incumbent preference for personalist elements destabilises regimes
as the military and single-party cadres reconsider their positions.
Second, neoliberal economic policies, implemented via structural
adjustment, accelerated this personalisation as the state's
withdrawal from the economy. This, in turn, affected the ability of
the military and single-party elites to access patronage. Finally,
the degree of military involvement in the formal political sphere
contributes to shaping the nature of the system that replaced the
incumbent regime under examination. Building upon a wide range of
literature the book argues that interest realisation determines
whether or not elite actors support regime change in authoritarian
systems. The volume will be of interest to scholars researching
politics, social sciences and the Middle East.
Shifting attention away from policy achievements and effects on
democracy, Giorgos Venizelos focuses on the charismatic function of
populist discourse - comprising antagonistic narratives,
transgressive style and appeals to the common people. The book puts
forward an integrative approach that brings together discourse
analysis, analysis of digital media, in-depth interviews and
ethnographic methods, and places into comparative perspective the
cases of SYRIZA in Greece and Donald Trump in the USA. Theorising
populism through the lens of collective identification, Venizelos
places the rhetorical and emotional dynamics of populist
performativity at the core of the analysis, offering a rigorous yet
flexible conceptulisation of populism in power. Against theoretical
expectations, findings suggest that both SYRIZA and Trump retained,
to different degrees, their populist character in power, although
their style and vision differed vastly. This book urges
researchers, journalists and politicians to adopt a reflexive
approach to analysing the political implications of populism for
politics, polity and society, and to challenge the normatively
charged definitions that are uncritically reproduced in the public
sphere. It will appeal to researchers of political theory,
populism, comparative politics, sociologists, and ethnographers.
'Nick Bryant is brilliant. He has a way of showing you what you've
been missing from the whole story whilst never leaving you feeling
stupid.' - Emily Maitlis 'Bryant is a genuine rarity, a Brit who
understands America' - Washington Post In When America Stopped
Being Great, veteran reporter and BBC New York correspondent Nick
Bryant reveals how America's decline paved the way for Donald
Trump's rise, sowing division and leaving the country vulnerable to
its greatest challenge of the modern era. Deftly sifting through
almost four decades of American history, from post-Cold War
optimism, through the scandal-wracked nineties and into the new
millennium, Bryant unpacks the mistakes of past administrations,
from Ronald Reagan's 'celebrity presidency' to Barack Obama's
failure to adequately address income and racial inequality. He
explains how the historical clues, unseen by many (including the
media) paved the way for an outsider to take power and a country to
slide towards disaster. As Bryant writes, 'rather than being an
aberration, Trump's presidency marked the culmination of so much of
what had been going wrong in the United States for decades -
economically, racially, politically, culturally, technologically
and constitutionally.' A personal elegy for an America lost,
unafraid to criticise actors on both sides of the political divide,
When America Stopped Being Great takes the long view, combining
engaging storytelling with recent history to show how the country
moved from the optimism of Reagan's 'Morning in America' to the
darkness of Trump's 'American Carnage'. It concludes with some of
the most dramatic events in recent memory, in an America torn apart
by a bitterly polarised election, racial division, the national
catastrophe of the coronavirus and the threat to US democracy
evidenced by the storming of Capitol Hill.
Digging Politics explores uses of the ancient past in east-central
Europe spanning the fascist, communist and post-communist period.
Contributions range from East Germany to Poland to Romania to the
Balkans. The volume addresses two central questions: Why then and
why there. Without arguing for an east-central European
exceptionalism, Digging Politics uncovers transnational phenomena
across the region that have characterized political wrangling over
ancient pasts. Contributions include the biographies of famous
archaeologists during the Cold War, the wrought history of
organizational politics of archaeology in Romania and the Balkans,
politically charged Cold War exhibitions of the Thracians, the
historical re-enactment of supposed ancient Central tribes in
Hungary, and the virtual archaeology of Game of Thrones in Croatia.
Digging Politics charts the extraordinary story of ancient pasts in
modern east-central Europe.
This book explores a new way of thinking about diplomacy, warfare,
trade, and collective goods that begins with the notion that key
international actors project their domestic institutions onto the
regional or global arena. Exploring the emergence, consolidation,
and decay of international norms, the author puts forward a general
argument designed to identify patterns across time and space,
combining key insights from constructivist, liberal, classical
realist, English School, and feminist thinking. By moving from
institution to institution, each chapter presents a coherent story
ranging from antiquity to the contemporary world allowing us to see
not only the patterns, but also to begin to develop conjectures
about other causal stories implicit in the narrative. The book will
be used by scholars and students of international relations,
international organization and law, security studies, political
economy, historical sociology, regionalism, and a wide range of
specific topics such as arms control, trade, migration, identity,
and collective goods.
Can entertainment challenge divisive ideologies? Can we use
theater, film, games, novels, and stories disarm the ideologies of
fear? Ideological Battlegrounds: Entertainment to Disarm Divisive
Propaganda introduces and develops Ideologically Challenging
Entertainment (ICE) to challenge "us versus them" narratives. ICE
counters polarizing perspectives by embracing multiple valid
viewpoints without losing sight of facts. Additionally, this book
explores the first ICE production, Two Merchants, The Merchant of
Venice adapted to challenge ideologies related to the Arab-Israeli
Conflict. A mixed-methods study of audience responses to this
production showed that a significant number of audience members
reconsidered their views, not only about the Arab-Israeli conflict
but also about ideological divisions that were more personally
relevant. Ideological Battlegrounds is unique, both in its
conceptualization of entertainment as a means to address local and
global conflicts and in its provision of evidence for the power of
performance as a tool for confronting and influencing ideological
change.This book offers a new approach to bridging dangerous
ideological chasms that, without significant intervention, will
only continue to worsen.
|
|