|
|
Books > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Western philosophy, c 500 to c 1600 > General
This book of fifteen essays is presented in honor of one of the
premier historians of medieval philosophy, Armand Maurer of the
Pontifical Institute for Mediaeval Studies and the University of
Toronto. The authors, internationally recognized scholars in the
field of medieval philosophy and theology, are friends, colleagues,
and students of Fr. Maurer. They are united in a common love of
medieval thought and a common appreciation of philosophizing
through the study of the history of philosophy. Their interests and
methodologies, however, are diverse, and cover a range from Justin
Marytr, who died during the reign of Marcus Aurelius, to
Bartholomew Mastrius, a contemporary of Descartes. The
contributions are arranged chronologically, beginning with John
Rist's essay on Christian philosophy during the patristic era.
Richard Taylor demonstrates the importance of Arabic philosophical
thought for the Latin West during the scholastic era, which began
in the thirteenth century. R. James Long treats the early
scholastics Richard Fishacre and Richard Rufus. Following Maurer's
central interest, the majority of the essays (by R. E. Houser, Leo
Elders, Lawrence Dewan, David B. Twetten, Mary C. Sommers, and
James P. Reilly) treat aspects of the thought of Thomas Aquinas.
But just as Maurer did not confine himself to Aquinas, this volume
reaches out to other thirteenth-century figures and topics. John
Wippel looks at Godfrey of Fontaines, Timothy B. Noone studies the
Franciscans Matthew of Aquasparta and Peter John Olivi, and Stephen
Brown adds the Franciscan Peter of Candia. Reflecting Maurer's own
interests in fourteenth-century philosophy are the contributions of
Calvin Normore on logic and Girard Etzkorn on the Franciscan
Francis of Mayronis. The essay by Norman Wells focuses on the
Franciscan Batholomew Mastrius. The volume concludes with a
wonderful autobiography of his education by Maurer himself and a
biliography of Maurer's writings.
The Renaissance witnessed an upsurge in explanations of natural
events in terms of invisibly small particles - atoms, corpuscles,
minima, monads and particles. The reasons for this development are
as varied as are the entities that were proposed. This volume
covers the period from the earliest commentaries on Lucretius' De
rerum natura to the sources of Newton's alchemical texts.
Contributors examine key developments in Renaissance physiology,
meteorology, metaphysics, theology, chymistry and historiography,
all of which came to assign a greater explanatory weight to minute
entities. These contributions show that there was no simple
'revival of atomism', but that the Renaissance confronts us with a
diverse and conceptually messy process. Contributors are: Stephen
Clucas, Christoph Luthy, Craig Martin, Elisabeth Moreau, William R.
Newman, Elena Nicoli, Sandra Plastina, Kuni Sakamoto, Jole
Shackelford, and Leen Spruit.
These essays present new readings of Anselm's speculative and
spiritual writings on topics including his relationship to
Augustine, proofs for God's existence, faith and reason, human
freedom and the problem of evil, his spiritual meditations and
prayers, as well as Anselm's reception by 19th and 20th century
thinkers, modernism, and feminism. These philosophical, theological
and literary analyses bring fresh perspectives on Anselm both in
his historical context and in dialogue with contemporary questions.
Contributors are: Tomas Ekenberg, Riccardo Fredriga, Emery de Gaal,
Kyle Philip Hubbard, Maggie Ann Labinski, Roberto Limonta, Ian
Logan, Gavin Ortlund, M.B. Pranger, Gregory B. Sadler, Kevin
Staley, Karen Sullivan, Eileen C. Sweeney, Michael Vendsel, Luca
Vettorello, James Wetzel, and Kevin White. See inside the book.
This monograph is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian
essentialism and modal logic. In Chapter One, ancient and
contemporary interpretations and claims of inconsistency in
Aristotle's modal syllogistic are examined. A more consistent model
is developed through attention to Aristotle's comments on negation.
In Chapter Two, proofs for each of the mixed apodictic syllogisms
are analyzed and diagrammed. Chapter Three explores how Aristotle's
modal metaphysics fits within the context of the Posterior
Analytics. Chapter Four contrasts Aristotelian modal logic to
contemporary modal metaphysics and argues for ways in which a
return to Aristotle may spark intriguing thought in contemporary
discussions of the philosophy of science and in debate over the
metaphysics of identity.
Machiavelli is chiefly known for The Prince, but his main
considerations on politics are found in his later work Discourses
on Livy. Despite this book's historical and theoretical importance,
its complexity, length and style have often discouraged new readers
and interpreters of Machiavelli from engaging with it. For this
reason, the Discourses has not been given the attention it
deserves. This volume of newly commissioned essays by some of the
world’s leading Machiavelli experts seeks to remedy this
deficiency. It is the first collective volume dedicated
specifically to this profound work, covering topics such as
Machiavelli’s republicanism, the relation between liberty and
tyranny, the role of religion, Machiavelli’s conception of
history, his writing style, his view of society as a plural and
conflictive body, his suggestion of how a free state should be
organized, and his notions of people and virtù. Contributors:
Jérémie Barthas, Thomas Berns, Alessandro Campi, J. Patrick Coby,
Marie Gaille, Marco Geuna, Mark Jurdjevic, Cary J. Nederman,
Gabriele Pedullà , Diogo Pires Aurélio, Fabio Raimondi, Andre
Santos Campos, Miguel Vatter, and Camila Vergara.
This is the first volume exclusively devoted to the Expositio by
Berthold of Moosburg (c.1295-c.1361) on Proclus' Elements of
Theology. The breadth of its vision surpasses every other known
commentary on the Elements of Theology, for it seeks to present a
coherent account of the Platonic tradition as such (unified through
the concord of Proclus and Dionysius) and at the same time to
consolidate and transform a legacy of metaphysics developed in the
German-speaking lands by Peripatetic authors (like Albert the
Great, Ulrich of Strassburg, and Dietrich of Freiberg). This volume
aims to provide a basis for further research and discussion of this
unduly overlooked commentary, whose historical-philosophical
importance as an attempt to refound Western metaphysics is
beginning to be recognized. The publication of this volume has
received the generous support of the European Research Council
(ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme through the ERC Consolidator Grant NeoplAT: A
Comparative Analysis of the Middle East, Byzantium and the Latin
West (9th-16th Centuries), grant agreement No 771640
(www.neoplat.eu).
The interplay between nature, science, and art in antiquity and the
early modern period differs significantly from late modern
expectations. In this book scholars from ancient studies as well as
early modern studies, art history, literary criticism, philosophy,
and the history of science, explore that interplay in several
influential ancient texts and their reception in the Renaissance.
The Natural History of Pliny, De Architectura of Vitruvius, De
Rerum Natura of Lucretius, Automata of Hero, and Timaios of Plato
among other texts reveal how fields of inquiry now considered
distinct were originally understood as closely interrelated. In our
choice of texts, we focus on materialistic theories of nature,
knowledge, and art that remain underappreciated in ancient and
early modern studies even today.
This volume is a collection of essays written by colleagues and
friends in honor of Michael W. Blastic, O.F.M., on the occasion of
his 70th birthday. The contributing scholars endeavored to address
significant issues within the academic areas in which Fr. Blastic
has taught and published. Three essays are devoted to the Writings
of Saint Francis; seven are dedicated to particular issues in
Franciscan history, hagiography, spirituality and several texts;
five deal specifically with women during the Middle Ages; and three
final essays explore aspects of Franciscan theology and philosophy.
Fr. Michael Blastic has taught at the Washington Theological Union,
the Franciscan Institute at St. Bonaventure University and Siena
College and served as a widely-respected retreat master.
Contributors are Maria Pia Alberzoni, Luciano Bertazzo, O.F.M.
Conv., Joshua C. Benson, Aaron Canty, Joseph Chinnici, O.F.M.,
Michael F. Cusato, O.F.M., Jay M. Hammond, J.A. Wayne Hellmann,
O.F.M. Conv., Timothy J. Johnson, Lezlie Knox, Pietro Maranesi,
Steven J. McMichael, O.F.M. Conv., Benedikt Mertens, O.F.M.,
Catherine M. Mooney, Luigi Pellegrini, Michael Robson, and William
J. Short, O.F.M.
This collection of essays presents new insights into what shaped
and constituted the Renaissance and early modern views of fate and
fortune. It argues that these ideas were emblematic of a more
fundamental argument about the self, society, and the universe and
shows that their influence was more widespread, both geographically
and thematically, than hitherto assumed.
Since the publication of the edition of John Blund's Tractatus de
anima by the British Academy in 1970 there has been widespread
acceptance of the importance of this text for the history of
thought. Blund (ca. 1175-1248) was probably one of the first
commentators on the libri naturales at Paris before the prohibition
of 1210, and later introduced them to Oxford. Indeed, apart from
the prohibitions of 1210 and 1215, the De anima of Blund is the one
text which sheds light on the first reception of Aristotle at
Paris. The text was probably composed at Paris, before 1204. Blund
taught arts at Paris ca. 1200-1205, then at Oxford towards
1207-1209. He returned to study theology at Paris during the
interdict (1208-1214) and the contemporaneous suspension of the
schools at Oxford (1209-1214). He was regent in theology at Paris
for twelve years, and taught theology at Oxford after 1229. With
the Tractatus a whole area of philosophical speculation - namely
Greek and Arabic psychology - arrived at Oxford, where it would
continue to grow and be debated throughout the century. Blund did
not know Averroes but he reflects the state of Latin
Aristotelianism during the first third of the thirteenth century.
Like his contemporaries Blund regarded the De anima of Avicenna as
a commentary on Aristotle; indeed they found it clearer than the
text of Aristotle and were guided by it. Blund is faithful to
Aristotle and to Avicenna, rejecting, for example, the binarium
famosissimum drawn from the Fons vitae of Avicebron. In expounding
the doctrine of Aristotle and following the plan laid out by
Avicenna, he considers the arguments for and against before
offering his own reasoned position in the solutio. He defends the
role of the philosopher as considering the nature of the soul and
as distinct from theological considerations. This new English
translation makes available this important text to a wider audience
of scholars interested in philosophy, theology, medieval history
and the history of science and psychology. Students who are
learning medieval Latin will be able to follow the original Latin
with the help of the parallel translation and text notes.
Spanning the period of 1523 to 1534, the compositions in Volume 78
of the Collected Works of Erasmus detail Erasmus' theological
disagreements with the Swiss and Upper German 'evangelicals' and
the German Lutherans, including Luther himself. While volumes 76
and 77 of the series focus on the controversy with Luther over the
"freedom of the will," the wider lens of this volume also captures
the conflicts between Erasmus and contemporaries such as Hutten,
Eppendorf, Oecolampadius, Capito, and Bucer. These writings reveal
the dialogue between Erasmus and those evangelicals who had
appropriated and adapted his views on the Eucharist and set forth
his defense of the toleration of heretics and a point-by-point
rebuttal of Luther's ultimate accusations, which had rejected
Erasmus as a Christian. Throughout, the original words of Erasmus
are presented in contemporary English translation by eminent
scholars of sixteenth-century studies, who also discuss the
historical and theological contexts of the controversies. Volume 78
of the Collected Works of Erasmus series.
In Before Enlightenment: Play and Illusion in Renaissance Humanism,
Timothy Kircher argues for new ways of appreciating Renaissance
humanist philosophy. Literary qualities - tone, voice, persona,
style, imagery - composed a core of their philosophizing, so that
play and illusion, as well as rational certainty, formed
pre-Enlightenment ideas about knowledge, ethics, and metaphysics.
Before Enlightenment takes issue with the long-standing view of
humanism's philosophical mediocrity. It shows new features of
Renaissance culture that help explain the origins not only of
Enlightenment rationalists, but also of early modern novelists and
essayists. If humanist writings promoted objective knowledge based
on reason's supremacy over emotion, they also showed awareness of
one's place and play in the world. The animal rationale is also the
homo ludens.
The new Companion to Erasmus in the Renaissance Society of
America’s Texts and Studies Series draws on the insights of an
international team of distinguished experts whose contributions are
arrayed in eleven chapters followed by a detailed chronological
catalogue of Erasmus’ works and an up-to-date bibliography of
secondary sources. The ambition of this companion is to illuminate
every aspect of Erasmus’ life, work, and legacy while providing
an expert synthesis of the most inspiring research in the field.
This volume will be of invaluable assistance to students and
teachers working in any of the numerous disciplines to which
Erasmus devoted his tireless efforts, including philosophy,
religion, history, rhetoric, education, and the history of the
book.
|
|