|
|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Protestantism & Protestant Churches > Other Protestant & Nonconformist Churches
"Can anything orthodox come from Pentecostalism?" This recasting of
Nathaniel's familiar question from the Gospel is a fair summary of
many modern Christians' assessment of the Pentecostal tradition.
Yet in recent years, a growing number of Pentecostals have been
turning afresh to the ancient, creedal Christian faith. Bishop
Emilio Alvarez has himself been at the forefront of this movement.
In Pentecostal Orthodoxy he introduces the phenomenon, and extends
the project of paleo-orthodox ressourcement (associated with
scholars such as Thomas Oden and Robert Webber) to include orthodox
expressions within Pentecostalism, particularly his own Afro-Latino
Pentecostal movement. This book is a manifesto of sorts, promising
not only to open up the possibility of a genuinely orthodox
Pentecostalism, but to reframe modern ecumenical dialogue as well.
This book investigates a puzzling and neglected phenomenon - the
rise of English Arminianism during the decade of puritan rule.
Throughout the 1650s, numerous publications, from scholarly folios
to popular pamphlets, attacked the doctrinal commitments of
Reformed Orthodoxy. This anti-Calvinist onslaught came from
different directions: episcopalian royalists (Henry Hammond,
Herbert Thorndike, Peter Heylyn), radical puritan defenders of the
regicide (John Goodwin and John Milton), and sectarian Quakers and
General Baptists. Unprecedented rejection of Calvinist soteriology
was often coupled with increased engagement with Catholic, Lutheran
and Remonstrant alternatives. As a result, sophisticated Arminian
publications emerged on a scale that far exceeded the Laudian era.
Cromwellian England therefore witnessed an episode of religious
debate that significantly altered the doctrinal consensus of the
Church of England for the remainder of the seventeenth century. The
book will appeal to historians interested in the contested nature
of 'Anglicanism' and theologians interested in Protestant debates
regarding sovereignty and free will. Part One is a work of
religious history, which charts the rise of English Arminianism
across different ecclesial camps - episcopal, puritan and
sectarian. These chapters not only introduce the main protagonists
but also highlight a surprising range of distinctly English
Arminian formulations. Part Two is a work of historical theology,
which traces the detailed doctrinal formulations of two prominent
divines - the puritan John Goodwin and the episcopalian Henry
Hammond. Their Arminian theologies are set in the context of the
Western theological tradition and the soteriological debates, that
followed the Synod of Dort. The book therefore integrates
historical and theological enquiry to offer a new perspective on
the crisis of 'Calvinism' in post-Reformation England.
 |
Try Faith
(Hardcover)
Irene Horn-Brown
|
R565
R520
Discovery Miles 5 200
Save R45 (8%)
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
God, as depicted in popular evangelical literature, is loving and
friendly, described in heartfelt, often saccharine prose evocative
of nostalgia, comfortable domesticity, and familial love. This
emotional appeal is a widely-adopted strategy of the writers most
popular among American evangelicals, including such high-profile
pastors as Max Lucado, Rick Warren, and Joel Osteen. Todd M.
Brenneman offers an in-depth examination of this previously
unexplored aspect of American evangelical identity: sentimentality,
which aims to produce an emotional response by appealing to
readers' notions of familial relationships, superimposed on their
relationship with God. Brenneman argues that evangelicals use
sentimentality to establish authority in the public
sphere-authority that is, by its emotional nature, unassailable by
rational investigation. Evangelicals also deploy sentimentality to
try to bring about change in society, though, as Brenneman shows,
the sentimental focus on individual emotion and experience can
undermine the evangelical agenda. Sentimentality not only allows
evangelicals to sidestep intellectual questioning, but sets the
stage for doctrinal change as well as weakening the evangelical
vision of transforming society into the kingdom of God.
|
|