|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes
Every American president, from Washington to Biden: Their lives, policies, foibles, and legacies, assessed with clear-eyed authority and wit.
Authors of the acclaimed Killing books, the #1 bestselling narrative history series in the world, Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard begin a new direction with Confronting the Presidents.
From Washington to Jefferson, Lincoln to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Kennedy to Nixon, Reagan to Obama and Biden, the 45 United States presidents have left lasting impacts on our nation. Some of their legacies continue today, some are justly forgotten, and some have changed as America has changed. Whether famous, infamous, or obscure, all the presidents shaped our nation in unexpected ways.
The authors' extensive research has uncovered never before seen historical facts based on private correspondence and newly discovered documentation, such as George Washington's troubled relationship with his mother.
In Confronting the Presidents, O’Reilly and Dugard present 45 wonderfully entertaining and insightful portraits of each president, with no-spin commentary on their achievements―or lack thereof. Who best served America, and who undermined the founding ideals? Who were the first ladies, and what were their surprising roles in making history? Which presidents were the best, which the worst, and which didn’t have much impact? How do decisions made in one era, under the pressure of particular circumstances, still resonate today? And what do presidents like to eat, drink, and do when they aren’t working―or even sometimes when they are?
These and many more questions are answered in each fascinating chapter of Confronting the Presidents. Written with O’Reilly and Dugard’s signature style, authority, and eye for telling detail, Confronting the Presidents will delight all readers of history, politics, and current affairs, especially during the 2024 election season.
The issue of electoral reform has divided the Labour Party since
its inception, but only for a brief period in the early 20th
century has the Party been committed to reforming
first-past-the-post (FPTP). Now, having suffered four successive
general election defeats, the Labour Party will have to reconsider
its electoral strategy if it is, once again, to become a party of
government. For some, a commitment to electoral reform is an
indispensable step to widen support, transform the Party, and
unlock British Politics. For others, the present system still
offers the best hope of majority Labour governments, avoiding deals
with the Party's rivals and the watering down of Labour's social
democratic agenda. This book explores the Labour Party's approaches
towards reforming the Westminster electoral system, and more
widely, its perception of electoral pacts and coalition government.
The opening chapters chart the debate from the inception of the
Party up to the electoral and political impact of Thatcherism. From
there, the book takes a closer look at significant recent events,
including the Plant Report, the Jenkins Commission, the end of New
Labour, the Alternative Vote Referendum, and closing with the
Labour leadership containing the matter at Party Conference, 2021.
Importantly, it offers an assessment of the pressures and
environment in which Labour politicians have operated. Extensive
elite-level interviews and new archival research offers the reader
a comprehensive and definitive account of this debate.
At the end of the Cold War, international law scholars engaged in
furious debate over whether principles of democratic legitimacy had
entered international law. Many argued that a "democratic
entitlement" was then emerging. Others were skeptical that
international practice in democracy promotion was either consistent
or sufficiently widespread and many found the idea of a democratic
entitlement dangerous. Those debates, while ongoing, have not been
comprehensively revisited in almost twenty years. This research
review identifies the leading scholarship of the past two decades
on these and other questions. It focuses particular attention on
the normative consequences of the recent "democratic recession" in
many regions of the world.
Almost three decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, today
more often than ever, global media and intellectuals rely on the
concept of homo sovieticus to explain Russia's authoritarian ills.
Homo sovieticus - or the Soviet man - is understood to be a
double-thinking, suspicious and fearful conformist with no
morality, an innate obedience to authority and no public demands;
they have been forged in the fires of the totalitarian conditions
in which they find themselves. But where did this concept come
from? What analytical and ideological pillars does it stand on?
What is at stake in using this term today? The Afterlife of the
'Soviet Man' addresses all these questions and even explains why -
at least in its contemporary usage - this concept should be
abandoned altogether.
In this thought-provoking book, Günter Frankenberg explores why
authoritarian leaders create new constitutions, or revise old ones.
Through a profound analysis of authoritarian constitutions as
phenomena in their own right, Frankenberg reveals their purposes,
the audiences they seek to address and investigates the ways in
which they fit into the broader context of autocracies. Frankenberg
outlines the essential features of authoritarianism through a
discussion of a variety of constitutional projects in authoritarian
settings: the executive style of opportunist, informal governing,
political power as private property, participation as complicity,
and the cult of immediacy that is geared towards fantasies of a
community of the followers and their leader. He also takes a
comparative approach to authoritarian constitutions, drawing out
the relationships between them, as well as providing a critique of
the discourse around populism and authoritarianism.
Authoritarianism will be critical reading for scholars of
constitutional law, as well as political scientists, who will find
its comparative analysis of political systems in this context
invaluable. It will also be useful to students of comparative law
and political science for its clear explanation of the
characteristics of authoritarianism across regimes.
"Engaging and inspiring . . . Reading this book should make you
want to vote." Barack Obama In a world of sound bites, deliberate
misinformation, and a political scene colored by the blue versus
red partisan divide, how does the average educated American find a
reliable source that's free of political spin? What You Should Know
About Politics . . . But Don't breaks it all down, issue by issue,
explaining who stands for what, and why-whether it's the economy,
income inequality, Obamacare, foreign policy, education,
immigration, or climate change. If you're a Democrat, a Republican,
or somewhere in between, it's the perfect book to brush up on a
single topic or read through to get a deeper understanding of the
often mucky world of American politics. This is an essential volume
for understanding the background to the 2016 presidential election.
But it is also a book that transcends the season. It's truly for
anyone who wants to know more about the perennial issues that will
continue to affect our everyday lives. The third edition includes
an introduction by Naomi Wolf discussing the themes and issues that
have come to the fore during the present presidential cycle.
The New York Times bestselling author of My Grandmother's Hands
surveys the deteriorating political climate and presents an urgent
call for action to save ourselves and our countries. In The Quaking
of America, therapist and trauma specialist Resmaa Menakem takes
readers through a step-by-step program of somatic practices
addressing the growing threat of white-supremacist political
violence. Through the coordinated repetition of lies,
anti-democratic elements in American society are inciting mass
radicalization, violent insurrection, and voter suppression, with a
goal of toppling American democracy. Currently, most pro-democracy
American bodies are utterly unprepared for this uprising. This book
can help prepare us--and, if possible, prevent more
destructiveness. This preparation focuses not on strategy or
politics, but on mental and emotional practices that can help us:
Build presence and discernment Settle our bodies during the heat of
conflict Maintain our safety, sanity, and stability under dangerous
circumstances Heal our personal and collective racialized trauma
Practice body-centered social action Turn toward instead of on one
another The Quaking of America is a unique, perfectly timed,
body-centered guide to each of these processes.
On a switchback ride through the USA, riding pillion with America's
founding fathers, Jonathan Freedland searches out the qualities
that made America the land at the end of his childhood rainbow, the
place his grandfather and he conspired to run off to because of its
open promise and unbounded potential. Noisy, crass, greedy, riddled
with crime, riven by race, obsessed by money: America, exporter of
junk to the UK. Or is it? From Lesbianville in New Hampshire to
Tent City in Arizona, from the high kitsch celebration of Liberace
to the Bible Belt austerity of Iowa, from the paranoid militia of
rural Montana to Florida's Condo Canyon, this is a journey to the
heart of modern America - to Normal, Illinois. On his travels
Freedland reveals how Americans control of their own lives, shape
their own communities and vibrantly assert their rights. And
there's even a twist: the spirit that inspires the American secret
is actually our own - a British revolutionary fervour mislaid
across the Atlantic. This what has made America the diverse,
freedom-loving, self-sufficient, independent icon to the world: the
place where socialism never took hold because it is inherent in the
founding vision, where capitalism at the same time has reached its
apogee; where many cultures contribute to the national fabric and
yet the sense of belonging to the nation and reverence for its
symbols is unmatched across the globe. It's time Britain shared the
vitality: time to reclaim the revolution and bring it home.
Prime Ministers delves into the premiership's 300 year history and
unearths a host of fascinating, intriguing and little-known facts
about some of the best-known characters in British history, lifting
the lid on the top job. Find out about the Prime Minister who only
lasted 100 days, another who served for 21 years, or how Downing
Street came to be the Premier's residence. Brief, accessible and
entertaining pieces on a wide variety of subjects makes it the
perfect book to dip in to. "The Amazing and Extraordinary Facts
series" presents interesting, surprising and little-known facts and
stories about a wide range of topics which are guaranteed to
inform, absorb and entertain in equal measure.
Few people have made decisions as momentous as Eisenhower, nor has
one person had to make such a varied range of them. From D-Day to
Little Rock, from the Korean War to Cold War crises, from the Red
Scare to the Missile Gap controversies, he was able to give our
country eight years of peace and prosperity by relying on a core
set of principles. These were informed by his heritage and
upbringing, his strong character and his personal discipline, but
he also avoided making himself the centre of things. He tried to be
the calmest man in the room, not the loudest, so instead of seeking
to fulfill his personal desires and political needs, he pursued a
course he called the 'Middle Way' that tried to make winners on
both sides of a situation. In addition, Ike maintained a big
picture view on any situation; he was a strategic, not an
operational leader. He also ensured that he had all the information
he needed to make a decision. His talent for envisioning a whole,
especially in the context of the long game, and his ability to sees
causes and various consequences, explains his success as Allied
Commander President. Then, after making a decision, he made himself
accountable for it, prizing responsibility most of all his
principles. How Ike Led shows us not just what a great American
did, but why - and what we can learn from him today.
Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon's political partnership changed
the face of Scotland, bringing the country to within 200,000 votes
of independence and holding sway at Holyrood for more than a
decade. So how and why has their thirty-year alliance irretrievably
broken down? Break-Up tells the inside story of how the once
unbreakable unity of the Scottish National Party was ripped apart
amid shocking claims of sexual assault. With unrivalled access to
both camps and the women who made the allegations, and with
rigorously fair-minded reporting, journalists David Clegg and
Kieran Andrews go behind the headlines to uncover the truth about
this extraordinary episode, in a piece of political history that
reads like a thriller. Now fully updated, this is a jaw-dropping
tale of inappropriate behaviour in the highest reaches of power, of
lies, distrust and alleged conspiracy, with profound implications
not only for Salmond and Sturgeon themselves but for Scotland's
governing party and the wider independence campaign.
|
|