Books > History > History of specific subjects > Military history
|
Buy Now
The Foundations of U.S. Air Doctrine - The Problem of Friction in War (Paperback)
Loot Price: R413
Discovery Miles 4 130
|
|
The Foundations of U.S. Air Doctrine - The Problem of Friction in War (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R413
Discovery Miles 4 130
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Donate to Against Period Poverty
Total price: R423
Discovery Miles: 4 230
|
FROM THE AUTHOR: This study revolves around friction, meaning the
ubiquitous uncertainties and inescapable difficulties that form the
atmosphere of real war. More specifically, it attempts to utilize
the Clausewitzian concept of general friction as a basis for
assessing-and, if necessary, reshaping-the foundations of US air
doctrine. This critical application of friction gives rise to four
primary conclusions: (1) The key assumptions underlying mainstream
US doctrine for conventional air warfare have not evolved
appreciably since Air Corps Tactical School (ACTS) theorists
elaborated their theory of precision, industrial bombardment during
the 1930s. (2) Judged by their essential premises and logic,
post-Hiroshima theories of deterrence are little more than an
updating for the nuclear age of ACTS bombardment doctrine. (3) Both
ACTS bombardment doctrine and deterrence theory appear
fundamentally flawed insofar as they omit the frictional
considerations that distinguish real war from war on paper. (4)
Reflection upon the extent to which friction pervades the elemental
processes of actual combat suggests that the range of situations in
which greater numbers or superior weapons guarantee victory is
relatively limited; even in the age of thermonuclear weapons, the
outcomes of battles still turn, more often than not, on the
character and intelligence of a few brave individuals. The first
step in giving substance to these claims is to explain what the
central beliefs of US airmen traditionally have been. The reader
should be warned, however, that I have approached the writings on
war of airmen like Major General Haywood S. Hansell, Jr., and
nuclear strategists like Bernard Brodie-as well as those of Carl
von Clausewitz himself-from the perspective of two interrelated
questions. What overriding assumptions about war did these
individuals embrace? And what image of war as a total phenomenon is
bound up in their assumptions? In large part, answering these
questions is a matter of historical inquiry and, to be candid, I
have been far less concerned with writing history for its own sake
than with using the past to illuminate the problems of the present.
I, therefore, leave it to the reader to judge whether I have
managed to do so without injuring the historical record. Air
University Press.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.