Contemporary celebrations of interdisciplinary scholarship in
the humanities and social sciences often harbor a distrust of
traditional disciplines, which are seen as at best narrow and
unimaginative, and at worst complicit in larger forms of power and
policing. "Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siecle" questions these
assumptions by examining, for the first time, in so sustained a
manner, the rise of a select number of academic disciplines in a
historical perspective.
This collection of twelve essays focuses on the late Victorian
era in Great Britain but also on Germany, France, and America in
the same formative period. The contributors--James Buzard, Lauren
M. E. Goodlad, Liah Greenfeld, John Guillory, Simon Joyce, Henrika
Kuklick, Christopher Lane, Jeff Nunokawa, Arkady Plotnitsky, Ivan
Strenski, Athena Vrettos, and Gauri Viswanathan--examine the
genealogy of various fields including English, sociology,
economics, psychology, and quantum physics. Together with the
editors' cogent introduction, they challenge the story of
disciplinary formation as solely one of consolidation, constraint,
and ideological justification.
Addressing a broad range of issues--disciplinary formations,
disciplinarity and professionalism, disciplines of the self,
discipline and the state, and current disciplinary debates--the
book aims to dislodge what the editors call the "comfortable
pessimism" that too readily assimilates disciplines to techniques
of management or control. It advances considerably the effort to
more fully comprehend the complex legacy of the human
sciences."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!