The great romance and fear of bloody revolution--strange blend
of idealism and terror--have been superseded by blind faith in the
bloodless expansion of human rights and global capitalism. Flying
in the face of history, violence is dismissed as rare, immoral, and
counterproductive. Arguing against this pervasive wishful thinking,
the distinguished historian Arno J. Mayer revisits the two most
tumultuous and influential revolutions of modern times: the French
Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917.
Although these two upheavals arose in different environments,
they followed similar courses. The thought and language of
Enlightenment France were the glories of western civilization;
those of tsarist Russia's intelligentsia were on its margins. Both
revolutions began as revolts vowed to fight unreason, injustice,
and inequality; both swept away old regimes and defied established
religions in societies that were 85% peasant and illiterate; both
entailed the terrifying return of repressed vengeance. Contrary to
prevalent belief, Mayer argues, ideologies and personalities did
not control events. Rather, the tide of violence overwhelmed the
political actors who assumed power and were rudderless. Even the
best plans could not stem the chaos that at once benefited and
swallowed them. Mayer argues that we have ignored an essential part
of all revolutions: the resistances to revolution, both domestic
and foreign, which help fuel the spiral of terror.
In his sweeping yet close comparison of the world's two
transnational revolutions, Mayer follows their unfolding--from the
French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Bolshevik
Declaration of the Rights of the Toiling and Exploited Masses; the
escalation of the initial violence into the reign of terror of
1793-95 and of 1918-21; the dismemberment of the hegemonic churches
and religion of both societies; the "externalization" of the terror
through the Napoleonic wars; and its "internalization" in Soviet
Russia in the form of Stalin's "Terror in One Country." Making
critical use of theory, old and new, Mayer breaks through
unexamined assumptions and prevailing debates about the attributes
of these particular revolutions to raise broader and more
disturbing questions about the nature of revolutionary violence
attending new foundations.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!