This book may change the way legal scholars, political theorists
and policy makers look at our immigration policies. From now on we
have strong reasons for adopting a new default position for
evaluating and designing our admission laws and policies: the
exclusion of aliens seeking admission must be substantially
justified (vis-A -vis the excluded aliens) by the state. The burden
of proof should lie with the state. For want of such substantial
justification the alien is to be admitted.
As one the first in its kind, the book builds a comprehensive
case for changing our admission policies through an analysis of the
structure of the law and legal order. This opens new routes
previously left unexplored by experts in immigration law and the
ethics of migration. More importantly, as the admission laws become
untenable from the legal perspective, policy makers can no longer
hide behind the (formal) law.
The book also revitalizes the scholarship in ethics of
migration. The author shows how the seemingly diverging positions
in favour of (more) open or closed borders all point in the same
direction: admission must be justified and the first to do so is
the state.
Far from being utopian, the book renders the theoretical
arguments tangible and realistic through an elaborate discussion of
a concrete policy proposal by an expert committee on immigration
law.
In short, after reading this work, the reader is left with the
conviction that the current default position of immigration laws
and policies is not self-evident. As a result, the book already
achieves its goal: the burden of proof has been reversed
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!