An examination of the language of law in the area of political
representation, this book considers the development and recognition
of group claims brought pursuant to the Voting Rights Act and the
Equal Protection Clause in Supreme Court opinions. In his analysis,
Burke highlights the different, discursive strategies, broadly
identified as liberal and communitarian, used by the Supreme Court
to justify the outcomes of various cases, and he argues that no
particular strategy of justification is inherently politically
conservative or liberal and that no conception of political
representation is unassailable. Therefore, it is unlikely that the
Supreme Court will articulate a stable measure of fair
representation.
The Supreme Court offers one more forum in the deliberation over
what is fair representation; however, it is not likely to provide
minority communities with a legal answer to the problem of
political underrepresentation. As such, this book tells the
uncertain story of the creation of political fairness by the
Supreme Court. The language used to characterize what is fair and
representative, and the theoretical designs which the rhetoric
reflects, allows us to formulate concepts of fair representation as
legal standards evolve. By placing the debate over fair
representation in not only political and legal but also
philosophical terms, we are better able to understand the
inevitable tensions that drive the concept of representation into
new, ill-defined, and contentious areas.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!