"It is only the unimaginative who ever invents," Oscar Wilde
once remarked. "The true artist is known by the use he makes of
what he annexes, and he annexes everything." Converying a similar
awareness, James Joyce observes in" Finnegan's Wake" that
storytelling is in reality "stolen-telling," that art always
involves some sort of "theft" or borrowing.
Usually literary borrowings are so integrated into the new work
as to be disguised; however, according to David Cowart, recent
decades have seen an increasing number of texts that attach
themselves to their sources in seemingly parasitic--but, more
accurately, symbiotic--dependence. It is this kind of mutuality
that Cowart examines in his wide-ranging and richly provocative
study "Literary Symbiosis." Cowart considers, for instance, what
happens when Tom Stoppard, in "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are
Dead," rewrites "Hamlet" from the point of view of its two most
insignificant characters, or when Jean Rhys, in "Wide Sargasso
Sea," imagines the early life of Bertha Rochester, the mad-woman in
the attic in "Jane Eyre."
In such works of literary symbiosis, Cowart notes,
intertextuality surrenders its usual veil of near invisibility to
become concrete and explicit--a phenomenon that Cowart sees as part
of the postmodern tendency toward self-consciousness and
self-reflexivity. He recognizes that literary symbiosis has some
close cousins and so limits his compass to works that are genuine
reinterpretations, writings that cast a new light on earlier works
through "some tangible measure of formal or thematic evolution,
whether on the part of the guest alone or the host and guest
together." Proceeding from this intriguing premise, he offers
detailed readings of texts that range from Auden's "The Sea and the
Mirror," based on "The Tempest," to Valerie Martin's reworking of
"The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" as "Mary Reilly," to
various fictions based on "Robinson Crusoe." He also considers, in
Nabokov's "Pale Fire," a compelling example of text and
parasite-text within a single work.
Drawing on and responding to the ideas of disparate thinkers and
critics--among them Freud, Harold Bloom, Jacques Lacan, Jacques
Derrida, Hillis Miller, and Henry Louis Gates Jr.--Cowart discusses
literary symbiosis as Oedipal drama, as reading and misreading, as
deconstruction, as Signifying, and as epistemic dialogue. Although
his main examples come from the contemporary period, he refers to
works dating as far back as the classical era, works representing a
range of genres (drama, fiction, poetry, opera, and film). The
study of literary symbiosis, Cowart contends, can reveal much about
the dynamics of literary renewal in every age. If all literature
redeems the familiar, he suggests, literary symbiosis redeems the
familiar in literature itself.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!